Wednesday, April 16, 2025

40. Once For Yes

 

40. Once for Yes. Allie Millington. 2025. 272 pages. [Source: Library] [magic realism, mg fiction, 3 stars]

First sentence: My beginning began with a brick. Might not sound like much, but hey. We've all got to start somewhere. Brick by brick by brick, until I became a big enough box to fit people inside. Wouldn't have been my first choice. Too bad no one asked me. Almost fifty years later, and I was still full of them.

Premise/plot: Once For Yes is narrated by several characters, one of which is the apartment building itself, The Odenburgh. Primarily the narration is between the building (The Odenburgh) and Prue (from apartment 4C) with only occasional additional perspectives. Two major stories essentially collide in this one: a) Prue is mourning the loss of her sister, Lina, who died about a year before--hit by a car; b) The Odenburgh (the building) is facing demolition. The tenants have been put on notice to move within a month. The building is going down, down, and nothing can save it. The building--of course--being magical tries to communicate with Prue--more receptive than the others in the building. The problem? Prue is convinced that it is the dead Lina reaching out from beyond the grave. Can the building be saved? Should the building be saved?

My thoughts: This one is from the author of Olivetti--a novel from the perspective of a typewriter. This one had all of the same magical realism elements as Olivetti. However, the themes and tones are different. I don't know why the building impersonating a dead Lina bothers me. But it does. For better or worse. I didn't dislike this one. I just didn't love it. There's nothing wrong with merely liking something.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Monday, April 14, 2025

39. Vera Wong's Guide to Snooping

 

39. Vera Wong's Guide to Snooping (On A Dead Man). Jesse Q. Sutanto. 2025. 325 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, adult mystery]

First sentence: Vera Wong Zhuzhu should be having the time of her life. She is, in fact, having the most wonderful, lovely, delightful time. Today, like every day, she wakes up at four thirty in the morning and jettisons out of bed like an army general with a new troop of terrified soldiers to scream at. And today, like every day, she puts on her gear, protecting every inch of her skin from the sun, and bustles out of the house to go on her extremely aggressive morning walk.

Premise/plot: Vera Wong is back for her second novel. (The first novel was Vera Wong's Unsolicited Advice for Murderers). Characters from the first novel are present--and play significant roles--in the second. So do read the books in order. In this one, after falling for a phone scam, she meets a troubled young woman outside a police station. She soon finds herself snooping again...not knowing at the start if it is a missing person case or another murder. She soon rounds up a long list of suspects to befriend...and to investigate. 

My thoughts: I LOVE both books. I don't know that I absolutely love, love, love the series. But both books are SO enjoyable, SO fun, SUCH a treat. Highly recommend if you enjoy MYSTERIES with a heavy dose of humor.



© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

38. Wonderland

 

38. Wonderland. Barbara O'Connor. 2018. 288 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars, mg fiction, mg realistic fiction]

First sentence: Mavis Jeeter sat on the bus stop bench beside her mother and whispered goodbye to Hadley, Georgia. She took a deep breath and let out a big, heaving sigh to send a signal to her mother that she was tired of saying goodbye.

Premise/plot: Mavis Jeeter hates the fact that her mother keeps them on the move all the time. Mavis has never been settled in one place long enough to have an actual best friend. Her mom has a new job--as a housekeeper--and they have a new house--in an apartment above the Tully's garage. But will she find a best friend? Maybe. Maybe not. Rose Tully is left speechless by the arrival of Mavis and her mother (their new housekeeper). Mavis has forcefully announced that they will be the absolute best of friends. Rose-- who is in need of a best friend agrees--but what choice does she have? Mavis--as she soon learns--doesn't take no for an answer. Rose is soon spilling it all: Mr. Duffy--the gatekeeper of their gated community--has recently lost his dog, Queenie, and he is now sad, moody, unwilling to entertain her on the side. Mavis announces that she will help Rose cheer him up and they will do so by finding him a new dog. But is it just that easy?

My thoughts: I do have THOUGHTS. Conflicting thoughts. On the positive side, all the characters have flaws which means that they are fleshed out enough to be human. Another positive is that the characterization is not just centered on Mavis and Rose alone. While not all side characters are deeply, deeply fleshed out, ALL of them feel fleshed out enough that it is easy enough to put yourself in their shoes and see the world through their eyes. This goes for the adult characters as well which is rare in middle grade fiction. However, I didn't love this one absolutely. I found Mavis to be problematic. Of course this is subjective. I've read reviews on GoodReads that love, love, love Mavis and dislike Rose.

Mavis to me comes across as TROUBLE. She's bossy. She's inconsiderate. She doesn't read the room. She doesn't listen...at all. She doesn't accept people as they are. Of course, there are plenty of adults who haven't learned these skills, so perhaps it's a little much to expect a fifth grader to have them. Still. Friendship would go smoother if she would actually listen, be less bossy, take the time to understand. I also think she's trouble because she encourages Rose to break the rules. All the rules. The more significant keep-people-safe rules and the smaller rules. She tells Rose that breaking rules will make her brave and more grown up. Rose is easily coaxed into pushing past all her own boundaries of what feels safe and right and good AND push past the rules her parents have put in place to keep her safe. 

The big rule in question is leaving the estates/gated community AND crossing a busy highway on bicycles. As an adult, all I can say is that Mavis is a bad influence! And Rose at least has no business crossing highways on a bicycle. 

Mr. Duffy. What I have to say about him is that I think what neither girl seems to recognize is that a) it's more than the grief of a dog. Mr. Duffy is a widower. He's old. He lives alone. He's aware--even if the girls aren't--that he's getting older and less capable. And b) yes, the adults in the community could be more polite in voicing their concerns....it seems that Mr. Duffy IS at the point where he is mentally and physically incapable of doing the job he was hired for. He does seem to be showing signs of dementia.

Rose. Out of all the characters I love Rose most. It is not that she is perfectly-perfect. She's not. But she seems to be the kindest and sweetest and the most concerned with how others are feeling. I'm not sure that Rose and Mavis are actually well suited for one another....since Mavis seems to be temperamental, dramatic, bossy, and incapable of listening.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Week in Review #15


This week I reviewed eight books.

36. All Creatures Great and Small. James Herriot. 1972. 437 pages. [Source: Library] [semi-autobiographical, adult fiction, animals; 5 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy semi-autobiographical, fictionalized stories
  • You enjoy rural animal stories
  • You enjoy storytellers with a gift for words (the HOW it is told more than the WHAT is told)
  • You want to read the book the iconic show is based on

37. The Worthing Saga. Orson Scott Card. 1990. Tor. 465 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, adult science fiction, short stories, framework stories]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy science fiction and fantasy
  • You enjoy stories with deeply flawed characters (extremely well-fleshed out characters, characters that stick with you, but essentially flawed and very human)
  • You enjoy stories with a unique framework
  • You enjoy your science fiction with a big dose of meaning-of-life questions

33. Board book: Runaway Blanket. Nancy Deas. 2025. 22 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, board book, bedtime book]

Read this if...

  • You have little ones and are looking for another bedtime book

34. Board book: This Dog. That Dog. Jade Orlando. 2025. 24 pages. [Source: Library] [dogs, pets, board book, 5 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy reading board books
  • You enjoy reading books about dogs
  • You enjoy concept books about opposites

35. Touch and Feel: Baby Animals with tactiles for toddlers to explore. (Board book) DK. 2025. 12 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [interactive, touch and feel]

Read this if....

  • You enjoy board books
  • You are looking for a recently published touch and feel books with baby animals
  • You don't mind all the textures being the same

36. Board book: Richard Scarry's Bunnies. Richard Scarry. 1976/2025. 26 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, bunnies, board book]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy RICHARD SCARRY
  • You like bunnies
  • You like vintage books


31. Faith (Brides of the West #1) Lori Copeland. 1998/2020. 320 pages. [Source: Library] [audio book, christian fiction, historical romance, two stars]

Read this if....

  • It's a hoopla borrow and you are not picky (that's why I checked it out)
  • You enjoy mail order bride stories (and are not picky about how good they are)
  • You are inattentive to details and are not weighed down with overthinking about what you are reading


32. And the Beagles and the Bunnies Shall Lie Down Together. Charles M. Schulz. 1984. 100ish pages. [Source: Gift] [4 stars, comic strips, theology]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy Peanuts
  • You enjoy theology
  • You don't mind the inclusion of Halloween as a subject
  • You love LINUS especially

Century of Viewing Week #15

1910s

  • 1919 Backstage. I love, love, love this one. Roscoe Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have a show to put on....with very little notice. When the star attraction walks out angry--with good reason--the two have a show to save. The show they perform may or may not be wonderful....however this short is. Plenty of mishaps on stage...and Buster gets the chance to shine.
  • 1919 The Hayseed. Arbuckle/Keaton short. Of their latest shorts, this is the most forgettable perhaps? Maybe just because the others were so stand-out memorable. This one has a rural setting. I can't remember if it's a general store and/or post office? They deliver the mail, I believe. Or maybe that's Buster's job? Anyway, there's a villain who's trying to frame Roscoe's character....and there are a lot of onions to be eaten.

1920s

  • 1920 The Garage Roscoe Arbuckle and Buster Keaton's last short together. I LOVE this one so much. It has some of my favorite gags in it. I love how buddy-buddy it feels. So the two are working side by side at a garage as mechanics....and as firemen.
  • 1920 One Week Buster Keaton's first SHORT to be released. This is one of my all-time favorite shorts. It's SWEET, adorable, and FUNNY. A newlywed couple faces all of life's hardest stresses all within the course of one week as they build their first home together--out of a box-kit. A former rival has mis-numbered the boxes and chaos results. The weather is not kind either! Will these two survive their first week of marriage?
  • 1920 The Saphead. This is Buster Keaton's FIRST feature film. He was loaned out to another studio to do this movie. This was his first time to be a FEATURE star...as in not a sidekick. He plays the son of a wealthy man...who's trying to win the love of his life BY following the advice of a silly book. The book tells him that the modern girl ONLY loves bad boys. Drink. Gamble. Waste away your day. Stay out all night. Have a string of girls...etc. However, Bertie can't help being GOOD and wanting to say his prayers every day. What a relief that *his* girl is not a 'modern girl' and she loves him EXACTLY the way he is....the problem....HIS father still doesn't approve and puts up obstacles. Still it is his no-good brother-in-law who may just ruin his chance for happiness.....
  • 1920 Convict 13. Buster Keaton is a golfer.....who ends up having a weird dream sequence. It is not my favorite or best. HOWEVER it does have its enjoyable moments. This one, I believe, uses some of the gags that he used to do on vaudeville (the whole table act with him throwing around a basketball on a rope). It has its funny moments for sure. And I do like aspects of it.
  • 1920 The Scarecrow. Buster Keaton is a farm hand smitten with the farmer's daughter. However there is another rival for her affection. (Well, she is NOT in any way interested in the other guy.) This one has many, many merry and not-so-merry chases around the farm. It is FUN and SILLY and WONDERFUL. I absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE how this one resolves. The last half of this one is just magical.
  • 1920 Neighbors. Buster Keaton's character is head over heels in love with the girl next door--woman next door, let's be clear. The families HATE each other. There seems to be no way for these two to marry without causing major DRAMA. But that won't stop these two from trying....and the judge marrying them is a good sport.
  • 1921 The Haunted House. I am not sure if The Haunted House or One Week was my first *short* to watch with Buster. But OH how much difference time makes. I didn't *love* this one the first time around. Now I adore it oh-so-much. I do. I truly do. Buster Keaton plays a BANK CLERK who is having a BAD DAY. He ends up in a haunted house--aka the secret hideout for a gang of counterfeiters.
  • 1921 Hard Luck. Buster Keaton short. This one is definitely not my favorite or best. He plays a man down on his luck who is trying to un-end himself. Of course he doesn't have any luck. This is a comedy after all. He has some misadventures--including going fishing, going hunting, and doing some high diving. This one does have a BEAR. There's a long sequence where Buster has to get up on a horse many, many, many times. He finds a different way to mount each time, plenty of comedic moments. The fishing scene was also humorous. Still the story isn't my favorite or best.
  • 1921 High Sign I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this Buster Keaton short. I do. It was his first to film independently--without Roscoe. It was not his first to release. It is a good bridge between the two periods of his career, I believe. It is 1000% silly. It is extremely surreal. Buster plays a man who is hired to be both a HIT MAN (by the Blinking Buzzards) and a bodyguard (by a father and daughter). He soon realizes that he's being paid to kill the man he's being paid to protect. It is silly. It is fun. It grows on you. Granted you might not be at the point where you'll watch the same short half a dozen times in a month or two, but, this one has grown on me so much.
  • 1926 The General. My favorite Buster Keaton film. My steady Friday night commitment. I watched the William Perry soundtrack The General. I am still open to revisiting the Carl Davis one which I watched for the first time last week. So the plot? (As if you didn't know if you've been keeping up with my blog this year at all) Johnnie Gray loves TWO things--his train, The General, and his girl, Annabelle. When both are kidnapped by the enemy--Northerner spies--Johnnie Gray will risk everything to get them back. 

1950s

  • 1952 April in Paris Doris Day and Ray Bolger star in this musical. He works for the government--an assistant to the undersecretary of the secretary of something or other. (There's a song because of course there's a song). He was supposed to invite a famous actress to this convention in Paris, France, but he accidentally invites Ethel "Dynamite" Jackson (Doris Day's character, I believe that's her stage name?). On the cruise ship, these two do a little after-hour partying/dancing (in the kitchen) and decide they *must* marry on the spot...but will their marriage last. Ray Bolger comes across as a Buster Keaton clone in this one. His mannerisms, his expressions, EVERYTHING seems to be so Buster. I know, I know, I know that I might be seeing Buster where another wouldn't. But his facial expressions are so spot-on for being Buster. Except, of course, he's much taller.

1960s

  • 1967 Doctor, You've Got To Be Kidding. Sandra Dee and George Hamilton star in this one. She plays a young woman whose mother risks it all for her daughter to have a chance at becoming a singer, a somebody. She is content to be a secretary who sings for fun with her friends and family. Her boss--George Hamilton's character--is an egomaniac. Yet apparently he's so charismatic that she finds him irresistible...at least for one night. This romantic comedy has her pregnant out of wedlock with three friends willing to step in and say I do.....

1990s

  • 1995 Babe. Apparently while other people my age were watching Empire Records [and Clueless], I was watching Babe. (Though to be fair, I was a big fan of Clueless.) Babe is super-quotable, and at least for me so iconic. Babe, a pig, finds his place in the world. Lots of FOUND FAMILY. It is precious and adorable. Singing mice.
  • 1995 Empire Records I don't know *how* I missed this movie. But I had. It wasn't until everyone seemed to be posting about Rex Manning day that I became curious enough to seek this one out. IT was definitely entertaining and I can see why it has a following. I can see why if you grew up watching this one, it might be one you quoted often. I liked it. I would definitely be open to seeing it again. Though I'm not sure it will be an again-again-again-again thing. But once a year on Rex Manning day....I might could do that so long as it's streaming free. [I watched on Pluto] The plot??? It follows a group of coworkers over a twenty-four hour period. They work at EMPIRE RECORDS. Each one has his/her own worries/concerns. Rex Manning, a musician, will be visiting the store [on his tour] signing albums, etc.

2020s

  • 2023 Alien Intervention. This is a low-budget, slightly-different alien movie. It is set in 1967/1992. An alien visits a young desert girl and asks her to hide his glowing blue stone for safekeeping since he's just minutes away from being apprehended by the men in black, let's say. He returns for the stone twenty-five years later...she's still in the desert....and her life is in the dumps. She needs....wait for it....an alien intervention....to gain perspective on life. This one was character-driven and thoughtful. I don't know that I absolutely love it. HOWEVER, it was definitely worth watching.
  • 2025 Cinderella's Castle. This is a Team StarKid musical production. I'm not sure if it was *filmed* in 2025, but released on YouTube in 2025...it was. This is a darkly comedic [sometimes crude] adaptation of Cinderella...if Cinderella had skin-wearing trolls as villains. I was very conflicted as I was watching this one. On the one hand, some of the songs are super-catchy and the puppet work for some of the characters was just working for me. On the other hand, some of it is just distasteful, intentionally so. It is DARK and disturbing in some ways. But extremely light and silly in others. I did like the resolution. I know that if I coaxed myself to watch it a second time, I'd probably have the songs grow on me more and convince myself that I like it. I don't necessarily want to. I know that it won't be on YouTube forever and it was quite crude in places.


© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Tuesday, April 08, 2025

37. The Worthing Saga

  

37. The Worthing Saga. Orson Scott Card. 1990. Tor. 465 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, adult science fiction, short stories, framework stories]

First sentence: In many places in the Peopled Worlds, the pain came suddenly in the midst of the day's labor. It was as if an ancient and comfortable presence left them, one that they had never noticed until it was gone, and no one knew what to make of it at first, though all knew at once that something had changed deep at the heart of the world.   

ETA: I think this is the fourth time I've reviewed it for Becky's Book Reviews. I listened on audio book this time around. IT was mostly great. I absolutely love the first half--the framework stories. The short stories are hit and miss. I like some of them a LOT...and I detest/loathe others. The book as a whole is one that sticks with me vividly.

 Premise/plot: Imagine living in a world where there is no pain, no suffering, no grief, no fear, no anger, no violence, no injury. Wrong actions, in a sense, have ceased to have consequences. If a person were to hurt himself/herself chopping wood or tending the fires, then there would be instant--almost magical--healing. Even morally wrong actions are prevented, on this world there are no children out of wedlock; and the child is always the husband's never the lover's if you're an adulteress. Yes, there is an occasional death, but never for the very young, never for the able-bodied. It is hard to imagine for us this life of easy contentment. A life with no struggles? A life truly worry-free? A world where fire doesn't burn you and ice doesn't freeze you? Surely there must be a catch, right? Some reason why this world isn't a perfect paradise...

The change came in the middle of the night. Imagine going to bed with everything being quite all right, and waking up to find that life is not what you thought it was. Pain. Grief. Suffering. Worry. Fear. Anger. And it wasn't just emotional, as the village learned. It was physical, too. As one accident after another occurred, the villagers soon realized that they could not only be hurt, but they could also DIE. With the whole village (and indeed the whole world) in confusion, no one knows quite what to think. Is God dead? If God is still watching over them, why then is there suffering? Why suffering after all these centuries of watchful care? Folks are going along muttering that God doesn't look out for them anymore.

The old clerk trembled and nodded and his voice quivered as he spoke. 'I have read the books of ancient times,' he began, and all eyes turned to him. 'I have read the books of ancient times, and in them the old ones spoke of wounds that bleed like slaughtered cattle, and great griefs when the living suddenly are dead, and anger that turns to blows among people. But that was long, long ago, when men were still animals, and God was young and inexperienced. (5-6)

Yes, no one understands this Day of Pain. Least of all, Lared, our young hero. But it is Lared who will become the chosen speaker that will write the story and tell the tales that will explain this Day and give it meaning. Two strangers come to the inn, the inn that Lared's parents own, and it is Lared and his sister, Sala, who befriend them. Jason. Justice. A man and woman. The two are mysterious, no doubt about it, and more than one person suspects that they're coming is linked with the Day of Pain.

The two share their stories mostly through dreams and waking visions. Jason will occasionally share one the old-fashioned way, but most are transmitted directly into Lared's mind. Lared doesn't know what to think. He doesn't like the dreams. He doesn't like the uneasy feelings they leave him with...but he also knows that he has been called, chosen, if you will, to write this down. To record them. It is not his place to understand everything, just to write it down as it's been given to him.

Lared and his village provide the framework for the stories that Jason and Justice share. It is a story of two men, one empire, and one powerful drug.

Abner Doon. A name that still strikes fear in people thousands of years after his death. Some even say that he was the devil himself. But was he really? His name is associated with death and destruction, and in some ways, it is easy to understand why. He caused the death and destruction of the EMPIRE. The very arrogant, often corrupt, very stagnant empire. But was the fall of the empire really that bad? Wasn't it better for humanity in general? Jason Worthing certainly thinks so.

Jason Worthing. Another name that people fear to speak aloud. Why? It is a name of reverence. Many people feel that Jason Worthing is God. The creator of life. The sustainer of the universe, even. But was he really? Yes, he had a hand in establishing life and building civilization, at least on one planet, but the creator of all life? No. Just an ordinary man with unusual psychic powers who came from a technologically advanced society.

The empire. It's not that the empire was completely evil. Sure the empire had its fair share of corrupt and power-hungry politicians. More than its fair share. Every branch of the empire had its corrupt officials. And there was nothing that couldn't be bought--as long as you had money. But that wasn't the real crime of the empire. The real crime was that humanity was being robbed of its very soul, its very essence. They had lost the point of living. They were corrupting the very nature of our existence.

Somec. Perhaps the most powerful drug the empire had ever known. What did it do? It put the user into a deep sleep, a coma, if you will. First, the user would have his/her memories downloaded or recorded, if you will, onto a tape or into a bubble. I forget quite how they did it. I just know that there was a way of downloading and uploading memory. Then the assistant would inject somec. It wasn't a pretty picture. It burned. It hurt. It caused severe physical problems--sweating, discomfort, pain--but the user would forever be unaware of it because the memories would never include this part of the experience. Who was it for? At first, it was just for starship pilots. Their skills would be needed throughout a long voyage. And if a trip took hundreds or perhaps thousands of years, then they'd need Somec to function. The computer would always be able to wake them up in case of an emergency. But they'd arrive at their destination intact. So for colonization vessels, it really couldn't be any better. A ship would carry three hundred or so passengers and all the supplies needed to create and establish a civilization on another planet. So there were a few valid uses of the drug, I suppose. But the real corruption began when somec became a common necessity for the people.

Imagine the possibility of immortality. Somec offered immortality. The wealthy. The elite. The powerful. The brilliant minds of society were all given the chance for immortality. The more valuable society deemed you, the longer you would sleep between waking cycles. The common people lived and died naturally enough. But a good portion of society, became obsessed with immortality. But is living a thousand years natural if you spend 70% of it or so asleep? What does it accomplish really? You're not able to have friendships with others unless you're on the same sleep cycle. You're not able to maintain family relationships either. People could theoretically outlive their great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren. Love becomes to a certain extent irrelevant. Most things become irrelevant. No time for the finer things in life. Love. Romance. Music. Art. For not only do most people spend most of their times asleep, what little time they're awake they're obsessed with power, money, fame, greed, control. They always want more, more, more. Never content. There is no longer any joy in living life. But really too few people notice what they're missing. Except for one. The aforementioned Abner Doon.

Abner "rescues" Jason, if you will, and offers him a chance to become a part of something great. Jason becomes a starship pilot, a very famous starship pilot, and he eventually leads a colonization ship. Abner's big plan--besides the fall of the Empire--is to recreate life as it used to be. His plan? To spread humanity throughout the galaxy. To have human civilizations sprout up on thousands of planets. He knows that with the fall of the Empire, with the fall of technology, it will be thousands upon thousands of years before ANY civilization becomes advanced enough for star flight. He sees this as a way for humanity to wipe the slate clean and begin anew.

The Worthing Saga is the story of Jason's planet. How Jason "fathered" or "created" that world. And what happened to its inhabitants. What happened to his descendants. All these stories--and there are many--span thousands of years. Everything is leading the reader back to Lared. Back to the Day of Pain.

The Worthing Saga contains the previously published The Worthing Chronicle and nine short stories.

My Thoughts: Worthing Saga is one of my favorite, favorite books. And my FAVORITE Card novel. (Though I love Ender's Game and Speaker for the Dead.) The Worthing Saga is about the meaning of life. It is about what it means to be human. It asks important questions. It goes where few novels do. It asks what the meaning of pain and suffering is. It asks what the meaning of struggles are. It is ethical in nature. It asks the hard questions. But it is philosophical as well.

I love the world-building. I find the three settings within the book to be fascinating. (There is Lared's home planet which is the present-day setting; there is Capital, the planet from Jason Worthing's memory and stories, Capital becomes "real" to Lared as he experiences Worthing's memories through dreams; there is Worthing, the planet that Jason colonized with a handful of colonists thousands of years before the novel opens, again this planet becomes "real" to Lared as he experiences other people's memories through Justice, Jason's descendant.) Readers get a taste of all these societies and communities. Capital is decadent and immoral and corrupt. It is obsessed with the notion of eternity--of living forever. It "lives forever" by drug use. Somec. You might be under Somec--asleep--for anywhere from one year to ten years, and then awake for anywhere from one day (like the Empress) to three years. But somec disrupts EVERYTHING good and natural about life. An example of the decadence and immorality can be seen in the "lifeloops." People filming/recording their "real" lives for everyone to watch. Most--if not all lifeloops--are graphic in nature. It's hard not to be disgusted by the depiction. (For example, one actress complaining to her agent that he better not hire any seven year old boys for her next film.) Closely connected to the world-building, is the mythology of it. How Abner Doon's name lives on. He IS the devil. How Jason Worthing's name lives on. How people see him as being GOD. Both men are very much human, having strengths and weaknesses, being oh-so-fallible. But they have become collectively so much more than that. They've lost their humanity. Truth has been shaped and reshaped too many times to allow for them to be just human.

I love the characterization. I love getting to know Lared, Sala, Jason, and Justice. Not to mention all the men and women from the memories and stories. (I have a soft spot for Hoom.) I love the storytelling. I love the dialogue. I love how everything is layered together. How the story all comes together. How Lared slowly but surely pieces things together and comes to understand--if understand is the right word--the world. Card's characters are so very human, so vulnerable, so fallible. Readers see humans at their best and at their absolute worst within The Worthing Saga. Moments of compassion and redemption make it so worth while.


I love the ideas. I love the depth and substance. That is not to say that I agree absolutely with every single philosophical idea within the book. But it goes places most fiction doesn't. It asks real questions, tough questions. It explores ideas. One also sees the consequences (or possible consequences) of ideas. But it encourages you to think about deep things, to explore questions like why is there pain? why is there suffering? would the world be a better place without pain, without suffering? Is pain a necessary evil? Do we only feel joy and happiness because we know about pain and sorrow? what makes life beautiful? do we become better people through our struggles with life?


I do enjoy the framework. The Worthing Chronicle (1982) makes up half of The Worthing Saga. This is THE story with Lared being visited by Jason and Justice shortly after the day of pain disrupts his community. (It really is a haunting opening.) The second half of the book consists of short stories. Most of these short stories were written years before The Worthing Chronicle and were previously published. Tales of Capitol (1979): "Skipping Stones," "Second Chance," "Lifeloop," "Breaking the Game," "Killing Children," and "What Will We Do Tomorrow." Tales from the Forest of Waters (1990, 1980): "Worthing Farm," "Worthing Inn," and "The Tinker." Of these stories, I find Skipping Stones, Second Chance, and Breaking the Game to be most memorable. After you've read these stories, you almost need to go back and reread the first section. I'm not sure you can fully appreciate the book without rereading it a few times and absorbing it. Most of the stories--but certainly not all of them--are emotional. I love that the book is a book to be EXPERIENCED. 

ETA: YET I do have to say that I don't absolutely love everything. Some of the stories are EXTREMELY graphic and disturbing...one might even say disgusting. Not all of the stories. Not even most of the stories. And they are there to show the corruption and sickness of what humanity has become...so I guess they somewhat serve a purpose. Yet this one is distasteful in places.

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews