Week in Review #40

No books finished this week.

Century of Viewing #40

1920s

• 1920 Why Change Your Wife? Gloria Swanson is always enjoyable to watch. The plot of this one, well, is morally questionable and exceedingly ODD but extremely very SOAP OPERA melodramatic. Husband (soon to be Cheating Husband) is tired of his wife not wanting to foxtrot and dress....scantily. He leaves her for a lingerie model. Wife #1 overhears gossipers calling her frumpy decides to wear as few clothes as possible. Cheating husband sees wife #1 looking amazing. Decides wife #2 was a mistake. A banana peel gets involved....obviously...because why wouldn't it. And the two women end up fighting--literally--over Injured Cheating Husband. He divorces Wife #2 who moves on to another guy EXTREMELY quickly. Wife #1 becomes Wife #3. And now she loves fox trotting....scantily clad.
• 1922 Blood and Sand. My second Valentino movie, I think???? Set in Spain. He's an el matador. He makes bad choices. Though to be fair, he does try a bit at least to resist temptation. But not too terribly much. His character definitely could have profited from reading the book of Proverbs.
• 1923 The Pilgrim. Charlie Chaplin stars in 'The Pilgrim' as an escaped convict who finds himself posing as a minister--a terrible misunderstanding, though he does deliver a sermon on David and Goliath--when he plays the hero, he's given a second chance....in Mexico. But the end credits showing him walking along with one foot in Mexico and one in Texas.

1970s

• 1977 Valentino. This was a LONG biopic of Rudolph Valentino. It is absolutely rated R. I do want my two hours back--mostly. If it was a musical--which it is not--I'd say it has Evita vibes. VERY melodramatic. VERY over-the-top. I have extreme doubts that it's true to his actual life.

2010s

• 2013. Return to Babylon. A silent movie about silent movie stars. This movie features biographical sketches--though facts may be disputed here and there--of the first Hollywood celebrities. Focusing more on 'scandals' and tragedies than anything else. THOUGH not always. (There wasn't anything particularly scandalous about the sketch of Gloria Swanson). It is a very intriguing film. Because it was filmed on a hand-cranked camera and it captures the style of that era. The soundtrack was fabulous.

2020s

• 2022 Moonfall. Is it a great movie? No, no it isn't. Could it have been better if it was trimmed up and a bit shorter? I say yes. Was it enjoyable to watch my best friend? DEFINITELY. I had been wanting to watch this one for a while. And I'm so glad I finally did. It's predictable but fun enough if your expectations are not high. Science fiction. Moon is not the moon. Earth in danger. From the director of Independence Day and The Day After Tomorrow.

© 2026 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Week in Review #39

This week I finished three books. Two Bibles and a science fiction novel.

64. Speaker for the Dead. Orson Scott Card. 1986. 382 pages. [Source: Library] [audio book, science fiction, sequel]

7. New American Standard Bible Reference Edition. 1971. Lockman Foundation. 1730 pages. [Source: Bought]

8. New Marked Reference Bible (KJV). God. 1983. Zondervan. 1753 pages. [Source: Bought]

Century of Viewing #39



2010s

• 2013-2014. Flip or Flop seasons one and two. I haven't added this to my spreadsheet. It feels so shallowly fluffy that it's not worth the add. Each episode is about twenty minutes. A couple buys houses to flip them. DRAMA happens each episode as problems with the house are found. Will they make money or will they lose money. I find myself yelling at them a LOT. But the show is strangely addictive precisely because it's not very intelligent.

2020s

• 2026. Project Hail Mary. I am glad I read the book first. I think it does help viewers make sense of the movie. The movie is definitely centered on one or two characters. And much of the 'story' is told through flashbacks. If you've read the book, you know everything and there isn't much of a reveal or surprise--for better or worse. But it also helps the film make sense. What I disliked most has nothing to do with the story or the acting--but the soundtrack. I'll clarify, the VOLUME or lack thereof of the soundtrack. If you turn it up so you can hear the dialogue, everything is way too loud. Not a loud that is easily tolerated. It isn't just a few scenes where it's too loud--like you'd expect in a science fiction movie or an action movie. But the score of the movie itself is overpowering. The score is good, mind you, but it doesn't have to be louder than the dialogue to move you. As for story, man wakes up alone on space ship....later he comes across another person alone on a space ship....they become friends and together save the universe. It is definitely all about the relationship between these two. It is EMOTIONAL in places.

© 2026 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

64. Speaker for the Dead

64. Speaker for the Dead. Orson Scott Card. 1986. 382 pages. [Source: Library] [audio book, science fiction, sequel]

First sentence: Rooter was at once the most difficult and the most helpful of the pequeninos. He was always there whenever Pipo visited their clearing, and did his best to answer the questions Pipo was forbidden by law to come right out and ask.

Premise/plot: Speaker for the Dead is the sequel to Orson Scott Card's Ender Game. But you may not know--though you certainly may know--that there would be no Ender's Game novel if Card had not had this novel in mind, Speaker for the Dead was THE STORY Card wanted to tell. And the character Ender Wiggin needed a bit more fleshing out than a short story could provide. Hence he set about writing the novel Ender's Game. This one is set THOUSANDS of years later, but Ender is still young. Young being relative. Probably in his thirties? Andrew Wiggin is THE SPEAKER OF THE DEAD. The original, though he travels from planet to planet being "a" speaker of the dead. No one guesses how old he really is and ALL of his life's experiences. He's lived long enough that his heroic actions are seen as anything but heroic. Though he has wrestled with his conscience for centuries and doesn't need the praise or condemnation of others.

The book is set on the planet Lusitania. It's a colony with humans--Catholic colony, for the most part--and pequeninos, the "piggies." Readers meet colonists--several families--and the families readers get to know are the ones most interested in the science, biology, and culture of the piggies. Quite a few things happen that lead to SEVERAL people calling out for a speaker of the dead to visit their world. Though just a few weeks have gone by since the first message came through requesting his services--in the meantime two more, I believe, go through. But Andrew's arrival isn't met with applause and appreciation--not at first. But his coming will change EVERYTHING....for better or worse.

My thoughts: I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this book. I do think it is better than Ender's Game. Ender's Game is one I've read more often. I know the scenes, the characters, the plot. But it is Speaker for the Dead that is RICHER and more nuanced perhaps. It has DEPTH. It is so good.

This is what Orson Scott Card has to say about the book,

"How did Speaker for the Dead come to be? As with all my stories, this one began with more than one idea. The concept of a "speaker for the dead" arose from my experiences with death and funerals. I have written of this at greater length elsewhere; suffice it to say that I grew dissatisfied with the way that we use our funerals to revise the life of the dead, to give the dead a story so different from their actual life that, in effect, we kill them all over again. No, that is too strong. Let me just say that we erase them, we edit them, we make them into a person much easier to live with than the person who actually lived.
I rejected that idea. . . No, to understand who a person really was, what his or her life really meant, the speaker for the dead would have to explain their self-story--what they meant to do, what they actually did, what they regretted, what they rejoiced in. That's the story that we never know, the story that we never can know--and yet, at the time of death, it's the only story truly worth telling."

There are many things I loved about Speaker. I love how Ender has matured into Andrew. I loved seeing how much he's grown...changed. He is wise. But his wisdom doesn't make him less human, it makes him more human. I love how this novel is about taking broken things, messy things, ugly things--and making them whole, making sense of the chaos, making them beautiful. In some ways, it is more philosophical than Ender's Game. Again, it is the characters that make Speaker for the Dead such an outstanding novel. His characters aren't perfect--far from it--but they're real.

Sickness and healing are in every heart. Death and deliverance are in every hand. (240)

Of all of the humans, he is the one who will understand us. (347)

When you really know someone, you can't hate them. (370)

Once you understand what people really want, you can't hate them anymore. You can fear them, but you can't hate them, because you can always find the same desires in your own heart. (370)

© 2026 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Week in Review #38

I didn't finish any books this week.

Century of Viewing #38

1920s

• 1924 Girl Shy. A stuttering shy man with no experience at all even slightly with women writes a book about how to win all the ladies. The publisher sees it as a joke--at first rejecting it and then deciding to publish it AS a joke. Meanwhile, he falls in love with random person on the train because DOGGO. Also she falls in love with him because he shares Cracker Jacks? She's rich. He's poor. She ends up almost marrying someone else. He stops the wedding. I didn't love this one. I think the "stuttering gag" is a complete and total failure in a silent movie. And this one is WAY too long. So much could have been cut down because the moments between good bits or laughs makes the enjoyment of the whole go down. That's why I think Buster Keaton's shorter SHERLOCK JR, released the same year--one day later to be exact if Wikipedia is correct is a million times better. And it's half the length but A MILLION times more enjoyable. This one has a good enough premise perhaps--but it takes FOREVER to get anywhere. And when you are finally moving ahead with the plot the stuttering gag just slows it down all over again because you have to be reminded that yes this man in a SILENT MOVIE is stuttering.

1980s

• 1984 Ghostbusters. I enjoyed the song very much. I am glad I have seen it. It was enjoyable enough--I do love Bill Murray most of the time. I am glad I did not see it as a kid in 1984. Definitely would have SCARED me as a kid.
• 1989. Ghostbusters II. Technically a Christmas movie perhaps??? Doesn't matter, I don't think I'll voluntarily watch it again no matter the time of year. I would describe this one as I want my time back. Or if you don't love it after the first twenty minutes it's okay to abandon.

1990s

• 1997 Romy and Michele's High School Reunion. SUPER SUPER fun soundtrack. Enjoyable enough story. Romy and Michele are best, best, best, best friends--have been forever. Their high school reunion (10 years) is fast approaching...Romy wants to pretend to be super super successful....and Michele, she goes along with it not really caring one way or another. CAN their friendship overcome the stress of seeing their classmates particularly those that bullied them????

2000s

• 2005. Romy and Michele: In the Beginning. Is this the worst movie I've seen all year? Maybe. Probably. I'd have to look at my spreadsheet. But one star for sure. I am not sure about the casting. I almost wished that the roles were swapped with the actresses. I spent most of the video trying to figure out WHERE I recognized the one playing Michele. It is Virgin River. Of course she's been in plenty of movies and shows. So this prequel "movie" has so little plot that I'm not sure why it exists. But it shows the two friends moving to LA.

2020s

• 2026 Power Ballad. I wanted to love, love, love this one. I liked aspects of it for sure. BUT I don't know that I'd watch it again-again. (Though I might listen to the soundtrack at some point). Honestly, I enjoyed Paul Rudd as a wedding singer. The entire movie could have been him doing gigs as a wedding singer and covering songs with the occasional original....and him hanging out with his family and bandmates. But this wasn't that movie--not really. He plays a wedding where a famous ex-boy-band singer is a guest. The two sing together at the wedding and have an awesome time. They hang out after the wedding too. He plays some of his original songs for the famous guy. The famous guy enjoys and even gifts him a guitar. Though WHY he has a whole studio in a country he doesn't live and he's just a guest at a wedding--why does he have a collection of guitars and other musical-y stuff??? Is the guitar even his to give? A while later, wedding singer guy hears HIS original song on the radio being performed by famous singer guy. He's livid that he's not going to be credited with cowriting it at least. And no one seems to believe him that it is *his* song. So much drama and angst that goes on WAY too long. The movie is all about him coming to peace perhaps with just being a wedding singer and having the most awesome family life.
• 2026 Center Seat II. This is a five part documentary on Star Trek focusing on Star Trek Next Generation movies and the rebooted trilogy of movies. It mentions the series a little bit but not much. This is mostly-mostly about the movies except for when specific episodes connect to the movies. I have seen some of the first 'Center Seat' series but not all the episodes. Definitely interesting interviews and behind the scenes stuff.

© 2026 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Week in Review #37

This week I reviewed two books.

68. Scaredy Squirrel. Melanie Watt. 2008. Kids Can Press. 42 pages. [Source: Bought] [5 stars, picture book, emotions and feelings, animal fantasy]
69. The Little Mouse, the Red Ripe Strawberry, and the BIG Hungry Bear. Don and Audrey Wood. 1984. 32 pages. [Source: Bought] [5 stars, picture books, animal fantasy]

Century of Viewing #37

1920s

• 1926 Dancing Mothers. Do I pity anyone in this movie? NO, not really. I don't pity the cheating husband. I don't pity the cheating wife. I don't pity the man who is in love with the mother after amusing himself with the daughter. I don't pity the daughter who is confused as to why her mother fell in love with the guy she was chasing. Mainly I'm confused as to why the audience is supposed to sympathize with the mother. At least if the intertitles are to be believed. The mother takes the advice of her friend--someone who lost her son in World WAR I--that she shouldn't spend her nights at home while her daughter is out at nightclubs smoking and dancing AND her father is out with other women at nightclubs, probably smoking and dancing, and ETC. So she goes out to nightclubs and starts smoking and dancing. She meets the "scandalous" heart-breaker of a man that her daughter has fallen for and is chasing after relentlessly and shamelessly. So "for the sake of her daughter" she diverts his attention all to herself. Using a fake name--her stage name from before she married--and they carry on an affair. When all comes to light she BLAMES her husband and her daughter BECAUSE THEY ARE SELFISH AND THINK ONLY OF THEMSELVES. I mean granted, her husband isn't worth much. And her daughter lacks common sense and probably morals. BUT who raised the daughter??? NO pity to be found for this cheating woman who RUNS AWAY to Europe after being discovered BECAUSE HER FAMILY IS TOO SELFISH TO FORGIVE.
• 1928 Our Dancing Daughters. No relation--as far as I know--to Dancing Mothers which I watched earlier tonight. Three women--Diana, Beatrice (Bea) and Ann--are flapper friends who like to dance and party and be all the modern--drinking, smoking, etc. Bea has fallen madly in love and is regretting her earlier [lusty lusty] decisions. Ann puts on a show--depending on the audience. When she thinks a guy has all the $$$ and might marry her she is sweet, demure, all the innocent. Otherwise, anything goes. Diana is extremely extroverted and the life of a party. She'll dance on table tops, dance with all the guys in the room, just live it up. But she's "a good girl." Both Ann and Diana fall for the same guy. He thinks Diana must be immoral since she is the life of the party...so he chooses "demure" and "sweet" Ann who is plotting and manipulative just like her mother. Plenty of regrets Ben has after they are married. But will he get the opportunity to choose differently????
• 1929 The Trespasser. Gloria Swanson's first talking picture is all DRAMA. A couple weds quickly but the marriage dissolves just as quickly when his rich parents interfere. She keeps their child a secret, but, later when scandal erupts, well, she'll make the ultimate sacrifice....will she ever have a happy ending?

1930s

• 1938 You Can't Take It With You. Extremely very quirky from beginning to end. It is a romantic comedy that excels in side characters and charm. I definitely liked it enough to want to watch it again at some point.
• 1939 Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Another Frank Capra film. (I just watched You Can't Take It With You this past weekend). I liked it okay. Definitely unevenly paced in my opinion. OR else I was really extremely sleepy when I started it last night. One man fights for what is right....against all odds.

1960s

• 1962 Zotz! A professor comes into possession of an ancient coin that has magical properties when you say the word Zotz. But there are evil powers that be that want to get their hands on the coin....It is completely silly, quirky, ridiculous, but fun if you're in the right mood. I was in the right mood.

1990s

• 1992 School Ties. Set in the 1950s, I believe, this is a drama set at a prep school in Massachusetts. Lots of familiar faces in this one. Lots of football and French....and guys being not so nice to one another. I enjoyed it well enough.

2020s

• 2026. Leanne Season 2. I enjoyed this one. It isn't so much that there's actual plot, but, the characters and relationships of the family are well done and the episodes are funny.

© 2026 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews