Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Century of Viewing, Month Four


In April, I watched eighty-three things (some were repeats). Twenty-five were five-stars.

I started a Chronological Watch of Buster Keaton--many rewatches, some not. Hayseed Romance was something I watched and absolutely loved, loved, loved...but it was watched before I began the chronological approach! It is a talkie short.

I finished THREE decades this month: 1960s, 1970s, and 1990s.

The Karen Read trial has begun. I have been watching hours of court when it's in session. (Some days are half days, most are full days. Of course, Monday through Friday only).

April's 5 Star Movies

  • Adventures of Robin Hood
  • Aristocats
  • April in Paris (Doris Day)
  • Babe
  • Bachelor Mother (Ginger Rogers)
  • The Blacksmith (Buster Keaton)
  • The Boat (Buster Keaton)
  • Cyrano de Bergerac
  • The Electric House (Buster Keaton)
  • The General (Buster Keaton)
  • The Goat (Buster Keaton)
  • The Gospel of John
  • The Haunted House (Buster Keaton)
  • Hayseed Romance (Buster Keaton)
  • High Sign (Buster Keaton)
  • Les Miserables
  • Men in Black
  • Murder in Coweta County
  • My Wife's Relations (Buster Keaton)
  • One Week (Buster Keaton)
  • The Rainmaker
  • The Saphead (Buster Keaton)
  • The Scarecrow (Buster Keaton)
  • Schindler's List


Aprils 4 1/2 and 4 Star Movies

  • Notorious Lady (Jack Lemmon)
  • My Sister Eileen (Jack Lemmon)
  • Out West (Buster Keaton)
  • The Cook (Buster Keaton)
  • Backstage (Buster Keaton)
  • The Garage (Buster Keaton)
  • Doctor, You've Got To Be Kidding (Sandra Dee)
  • Coney Island (Buster Keaton)
  • The Bellboy (Buster Keaton)
  • Hollywood (1980) 13 part documentary
  • Cinderella's Castle
  • Convict 13 (Buster Keaton)
  • Empire Records
  • Alien Intervention
  • Easy Street (Charlie Chaplin)
  • You're Darn Tootin' (Laurel & Hardy)
  • Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
  • The Paleface (Buster Keaton)
  • Cops (Buster Keaton)
  • Three Ages (Buster Keaton)

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

April Reflections


In April, I read thirty-four books. Thirteen of the thirty-four were five star reads! This was also the month that I discovered how much I enjoy listening to audio books. (Though I think technically it was the last week of March I 'discovered' audio books).

Books reviewed at Becky's Book Reviews

34. Dead Happy (HappyHead #2) Josh Silver. 2024. [May] 416 pages. [Source: Library] [YA fiction, YA dystopia, 3 stars]

35. The Enemy's Daughter. Anne Blankman. 2025. 288 pages. [Source: Library] [MG Historical fiction, MG coming of age, MG fiction,  3 stars]

36. All Creatures Great and Small. James Herriot. 1972. 437 pages. [Source: Library] [semi-autobiographical, adult fiction, animals; 5 stars]

37. The Worthing Saga. Orson Scott Card. 1990. Tor. 465 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, adult science fiction, short stories, framework stories]

38. Wonderland. Barbara O'Connor. 2018. 288 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars, mg fiction, mg realistic fiction]

39. Vera Wong's Guide to Snooping (On A Dead Man). Jesse Q. Sutanto. 2025. 325 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, adult mystery]

40. Once for Yes. Allie Millington. 2025. 272 pages. [Source: Library] [magic realism, mg fiction, 3 stars]

41. Rebellion 1776. Laurie Halse Anderson. 2025. 405 pages. [Source: Library] [YA historical; MG historical, 4 stars]

42. Inkheart. Cornelia Funke. 2003. 563 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, MG fantasy, Mg Fiction]

43. The Hobbit. J.R.R. Tolkien. 1937.  320 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, MG Fantasy, fantasy, classic]


Books reviewed at Young Readers

31. Wrong Time Rooster. Michael Parkin. 2025. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [3 star, picture book, telling time, concept book, farms]

32. Monti and Leo: A Mystery in Pocketville. Sylvie Kantorovitz. 2025. 80 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars, early chapter book, friendship, animal fantasy]

33. Board book: Runaway Blanket. Nancy Deas. 2025. 22 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, board book, bedtime book]

34. Board book: This Dog. That Dog. Jade Orlando. 2025. 24 pages. [Source: Library] [dogs, pets, board book, 5 stars]

35. Touch and Feel: Baby Animals with tactiles for toddlers to explore. (Board book) DK. 2025. 12 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [interactive, touch and feel]

36. Board book: Richard Scarry's Bunnies. Richard Scarry. 1976/2025. 26 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, bunnies, board book]

37. Little Freddie Two Pants. Drew Daywalt. Illustrated by Lucy Ruth Cummins. 2025. 40 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, picture book, humor]

38. Snarky Sharky. Bethan Clarke. Illustrated by Nikolas Ilic. 2025. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, picture book, humor, animal fantasy]

39. Umbrella. Taro Yashima. 1958/1977. 40 pages. [Source: Bought]

40. The Saggy Baggy Elephant. Kathryn and Byron Jackson. Illustrated by Gustav Tenggren. 1947. 24 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, picture book, golden book, children's classic]

41. The Kitten Who Thought He Was A Mouse. Miriam Norton. Illustrated by Garth Williams. 1951. 22 pages. [Source: Bought [4 stars, Little Golden Book]

42. It's Hard To Be a Baby. Cheryl B. Klein. Illustrated by Juana Medina. 2024. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, picture book, babies]

43. You're a Poet: Ways to Start Writing Poems. Sean Taylor. Illustrated by Sam Usher. 2025. [March] 72 pages. [Source: Library] [nonfiction, poetry, 5 stars]


Books reviewed at Operation Actually Read Bible

30. The Screwtape Letters. C.S. Lewis. 1942. HarperCollins. 224 pages. [Source: Bought]

31. Faith (Brides of the West #1) Lori Copeland. 1998/2020. 320 pages. [Source: Library] [audio book, christian fiction, historical romance, two stars]

32. And the Beagles and the Bunnies Shall Lie Down Together. Charles M. Schulz. 1984. 100ish pages. [Source: Gift] [4 stars, comic strips, theology]

33. The Elusive Truth of Lily Temple. Joanna Davidson Politano. 2024. 400 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, historical fiction, historical romance, Christian fiction]

34. Cries from the Cross. Erwin Lutzer. 2002. Moody. 170 pages. [Source: Bought] [5 stars, christian nonfiction]

35. Short-Straw Bride. Karen Witemeyer. 2012. Bethany House. 368 pages. [Source: Library]

36. God's Masterpiece: An Adventure in Discovering Your Worth. Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Illustrated by Julia Seal. 2025. 40 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars; picture book]

37. When I Talk To God, I Talk About You. Chrissy Metz and Bradley Collins. Illustrated by Lisa Fields. 2023. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [picture book]

38. When I Talk To God, I Talk About Feelings. Chrissy Metz and Bradley Collins. Illustrated by Lisa Fields. 2025. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [picture book]

39. [Expository Thoughts on the] Gospel of John. J.C. Ryle. 1879. 353 pages. [Source: Bought] [5 stars, Christian nonfiction, commentaries]


Bibles reviewed at Operation Actually Read Bible

3. KJV Large Print Journal the Word Bible. God. 1769. 2016 pages. Thomas Nelson Publishers. [Source: Bought] [5 stars]

2025 Totals

2025 Totals
Books read in 2025128
Pages read in 202528690


January 2025
Books read in January30
Pages read in January7020
February 2025
Books read in February30
Pages read in February4782
March 2025
Books read in March34
Pages read in March8595
April 2025
Books read in April34
Pages read in April8293

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Saturday, April 26, 2025

Week in Review #17


This week I read nine books.

41. Rebellion 1776. Laurie Halse Anderson. 2025. 405 pages. [Source: Library] [YA historical; MG historical, 4 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy historical coming of age novels
  • You enjoy historical fiction set during the American Revolution
  • You enjoy reading books with epidemics--small pox in this instance

42. Inkheart. Cornelia Funke. 2003. 563 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, MG fantasy, Mg Fiction]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy books about books
  • You enjoy fantasy novels
  • You enjoy coming of age fantasy novels
43. The Hobbit. J.R.R. Tolkien. 1937.  320 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, MG Fantasy, fantasy, classic]
Read this if...
  • You enjoy classics
  • You enjoy children's classics
  • You enjoy fantasy novels with quests

 39. Umbrella. Taro Yashima. 1958/1977. 40 pages. [Source: Bought]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy classic picture books
  • You enjoy picture books celebrating independence
  • You enjoy rhythmic picture books
  • You LOVE Taro Yashima's incredible art

40. The Saggy Baggy Elephant. Kathryn and Byron Jackson. Illustrated by Gustav Tenggren. 1947. 24 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, picture book, golden book, children's classic]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy classic Little Golden Books
  • You love elephants

41. The Kitten Who Thought He Was A Mouse. Miriam Norton. Illustrated by Garth Williams. 1951. 22 pages. [Source: Bought [4 stars, Little Golden Book]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy classic Little Golden Books
  • You love CATS
  • You love fictional mice
  • You enjoy nature versus nurture stories
36. God's Masterpiece: An Adventure in Discovering Your Worth. Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Illustrated by Julia Seal. 2025. 40 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars; picture book]

Read this if...
  • You love books with mirrors
  • You enjoy books that are all about building self-esteem

37. When I Talk To God, I Talk About You. Chrissy Metz and Bradley Collins. Illustrated by Lisa Fields. 2023. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [picture book]

Read this if...
  • You enjoy books celebrating parenthood
  • You enjoy those sentimental sweet books [think LOVE YOU FOREVER or GUESS HOW MUCH I LOVE YOU)

38. When I Talk To God, I Talk About Feelings. Chrissy Metz and Bradley Collins. Illustrated by Lisa Fields. 2025. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [picture book]

Read this if....
  • You are looking for a concept book about feelings and emotions
  • You are looking for a theologically light introduction to prayer

Century of Viewing, week 17

1920s

  • 1922 My Wife's Relations. Buster Keaton. A man finds himself accidentally married and living with some unbearable relations. I absolutely LOVE this one. It's a great short.
  • 1922 The Blacksmith. Buster Keaton. I LOVE this one so much now that I've discovered the Buster Keaton approved cut of the film. Definitely recommended.
  • 1922 Frozen North. Buster Keaton. Life is but a dream. A man falls asleep at the movie theater...and dreams he's a villain in a film.
  • 1922 The Electric House. LOVED this one. Buster Keaton. A mix-up of diplomas leads a botanist to take a job as an electrical engineer.
  • 1922 Day Dreams. LIFE is NOT a dream. Buster Keaton. Run far, far, far away from that woman and her horrid father, Buster!!!! A man makes a deplorable deal in an attempt to win approval for a marriage.
  • 1923 The Balloonatic. Buster Keaton. Misadventure abounds after Buster finds himself accidentally afloat in a hot air balloon....
  • 1923 Love Nest. Buster Keaton. Life is but a dream. Yet another short where it's all a dream. In this one, a broken-hearted man vows to sail the seas in an attempt to forget his lost love....
  • 1923 Three Ages. Buster Keaton. This is a parody--of sorts--to Intolerance (1916). Intolerance was NOT a comedy--not intentionally at least. Though there was much room to poke fun perhaps. This was Buster Keaton's first feature film to STAR and DIRECT. (The Saphead was his first feature film, it was for a different studio). Three different time periods, the same love story plays out: Prehistoric, Roman, and Modern. (Intolerance had four time periods: Babylon, First Century Judea, French Middle Ages, and Modern). Buster Keaton was "stuck" with his leading lady. She won a beauty contest in the UK, I believe, and was promised a leading role in a Hollywood film. The original movie that she was to have a role in....rejected her as talent-less...and sent her off to do a comedy because 'acting skills don't matter in a comedy.' Buster was not happy either. She didn't take to acting intuitively and wasn't the best with direction coaching either. But it is what it is. (I am curious how the movie would have done if it had had a better actress--one more Buster Keaton's match.) Buster, I believe, did a lot of improv and changing scenes in the moment. 
  • 1923 Our Hospitality. Buster Keaton stars with his wife, Natalie Talmadge, in this period drama. It actually features THREE generations of Keatons. His father, Joe, plays a train engineer. Buster himself, obviously in the lead. And his firstborn son plays a small role as well in the opening framework. Buster and Natalie found out they were expecting during the filming, so, that effected how they filmed her....which led to some convenient blanket scenes. Joe Roberts who had long appeared in Keaton's shorts stars for the last time. He died before the premiere of the movie. So filming also had to work around his health. Essentially, feuding families....a son and daughter from both sides...ultimately fall in love....and after many misadventures--and dashing rescues--true love wins the day. The first version I saw was good, but, the second I came upon was LONGER and was a much better cut of the film. Again just showing that you have to be willing to search around and see what cuts are available and be willing to rewatch to see if you're missing out on anything.
  • 1926 The General. Carl Davis soundtrack. Buster Keaton stars as Johnnie Gray, a train engineer that loves his engine, The General, and his girl, Annabelle. He will be put to the ultimate test when both are kidnapped by the enemy. Love this one. Obviously. Which is why it keeps appearing weekly.

1970s

  • 1970 The Aristocats. Disney animated musical starring Parisian cats! One of my absolute favorite Disney movies.
  • 1978 Les Miserables. A GREAT adaptation of Les Miserables. It is ABRIDGED and quite severely cut down--as far as characters and extra side stories--but what it covers, it covers WELL.


1980s

  • 1983 Murder in Coweta County. Andy Griffith plays a HORRID villain and it's Johnny Cash as sheriff who might just bring about justice.

1990s

  • 1993 Schindler's List. I don't watch this Holocaust film often....but it is SO GOOD.
  • 1997 The Rainmaker. Legal drama. It was SO good as well. Definitely glad I watched it. Essentially fresh out of law school lawyer takes on his first case--one of corruption involving an insurance company. Will he win?

2020s

  • 2025 Not really 'completed' yet, but I am watching the Karen Read Retrial. Four days of trial this week. Some days are just about four or five hours of coverage, others are closer to nine. So expect that to have *some effect* on what I can watch heading into May.

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Thursday, April 24, 2025

43. The Hobbit

 

 

43. The Hobbit. J.R.R. Tolkien. 1937.  320 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, MG Fantasy, fantasy, classic] 

First sentence:  In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means comfort.  

ETA: I listened to the audio book narrated by Andy Serkis. It is a little over ten hours, I believe. IT WAS WONDERFUL, FANTASTIC, A JOY AND DELIGHT. He is a talented voice actor. I loved all his voices, except perhaps for some birds? But I recommend the audio a hundred million percent. I would say the audio book is perhaps better than the book. Perhaps. It definitely HELPS the singing portions! I usually skip the poems/songs when I read. But Serkis actually makes them enjoyable!!!!

Premise/plot: Bilbo Baggins has an unexpected adventure in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit. When this children's classic opens, Bilbo is decidedly not a burglar. But by the end of it, well, you may have to decide for yourself if he is or isn't... Regardless, Bilbo sets off with THIRTEEN dwarves on a get-rich-or-die-trying quest. They're off to face down a DRAGON, but the dragon won't be the only challenge they face. Will Bilbo return to his beloved shire wiser?!

My thoughts: I love, love, love, love, love, love, love this one. I do. I may even love it a tiny bit more than the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Maybe. It's a tricky thing really because in truth, I just LOVE hobbits. I love spending time with hobbits. I love Tolkien's insights about hobbits. One of the things I love about Tolkien is how quotable he is.

Quotes:

“Good Morning!” said Bilbo, and he meant it. The sun was shining, and the grass was very green. But Gandalf looked at him from under long bushy eyebrows that stuck out further than the brim of his shady hat. “What do you mean?” he said. “Do you wish me a good morning, or mean that it is a good morning whether I want it or not; or that you feel good this morning; or that it is a morning to be good on?” “All of them at once,” said Bilbo.
“What a lot of things you do use Good morning for!” said Gandalf. “Now you mean that you want to get rid of me, and that it won’t be good till I move off.”
He liked visitors, but he liked to know them before they arrived, and he preferred to ask them himself. He had a horrible thought that the cakes might run short, and then he—as the host: he knew his duty and stuck to it however painful—he might have to go without.
“Go back?” he thought. “No good at all! Go sideways? Impossible! Go forward? Only thing to do! On we go!”
He was altogether alone. Soon he thought it was beginning to feel warm. “Is that a kind of a glow I seem to see coming right ahead down there?” he thought. It was. As he went forward it grew and grew, till there was no doubt about it. It was a red light steadily getting redder and redder. Also it was now undoubtedly hot in the tunnel. Wisps of vapour floated up and past him and he began to sweat. A sound, too, began to throb in his ears, a sort of bubbling like the noise of a large pot galloping on the fire, mixed with a rumble as of a gigantic tom-cat purring. This grew to the unmistakable gurgling noise of some vast animal snoring in its sleep down there in the red glow in front of him. It was at this point that Bilbo stopped. Going on from there was the bravest thing he ever did. The tremendous things that happened afterwards were as nothing compared to it. He fought the real battle in the tunnel alone, before he ever saw the vast danger that lay in wait.
“You have nice manners for a thief and a liar,” said the dragon. “You seem familiar with my name, but I don’t seem to remember smelling you before. Who are you and where do you come from, may I ask?” “You may indeed! I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.” “So I can well believe,” said Smaug, “but that is hardly your usual name.” “I am the clue-finder, the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.” “Lovely titles!” sneered the dragon. “But lucky numbers don’t always come off.” “I am he that buries his friends alive and drowns them and draws them alive again from the water. I came from the end of a bag, but no bag went over me.” “These don’t sound so creditable,” scoffed Smaug. “I am the friend of bears and the guest of eagles. I am Ringwinner and Luckwearer; and I am Barrel-rider,” went on Bilbo beginning to be pleased with his riddling. “That’s better!” said Smaug. “But don’t let your imagination run away with you!”
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

42. Inkheart

 Inkheart. Cornelia Funke. 2003. 563 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, MG fantasy, Mg Fiction]

First sentence: Rain felt that night, a fine, whispering rain. Many years later, Meggie had only to close her eyes and she could still hear it, like tiny fingers tapping on the window pane. 

Premise/plot: Meggie has been raised solely by her father, Mo--whom some call Silvertongue--since her mother's death. The two are incredibly close. Both love, love, love BOOKS. Though for some 'odd' reason, Mo won't read aloud to Meggie. Still until the mysterious appearance of Dustfinger--one rainy night--the two are happy and content. After mystery and adventure are sprung on them--as most adventures are in fantasy novels--well, these two will have quite the time trying to hold onto what they have: each other.

My thoughts: I first read this one in 2007. I never got around to the sequels. I hope to this time around. I was conflicted last time, and I still am in some ways. I think the book suffers from uneven pacing. The first third--the pacing was excellent. The last third--the pacing was fantastic. The middle third, well, this book is LONG and it isn't always as tightly paced as it could be. I think the story itself is intriguing and compelling. It could just use a little trimming here and there to keep readers at the actual edge of their seats. 

I am going to try to watch the movie as well.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Monday, April 21, 2025

41. Rebellion 1776

41. Rebellion 1776. Laurie Halse Anderson. 2025. 405 pages. [Source: Library] [YA historical; MG historical, 4 stars]

First sentence:  "Take away this puke bucket, girl, and bring me a clean one!"

Premise/plot: Laurie Halse Anderson's newest book is historical fiction--set during the American Revolution--in the city of Boston, Massachusetts. Elsbeth Culpepper, our heroine, is a maid. Her mother is dead; her father is otherwise occupied and it is not a bit unusual, I believe, for young adults to be either hired out or apprenticed out. Her current employer--a Loyalist--flees the city leaving Elsbeth scrambling to find a new job or perhaps a new employer in the same home. She finds work--again as a maid, but essentially all-servants-in-one maid--this time for the Pike family. But there's not much time for relaxation when there's a small pox epidemic in town....and your employer has seven children! 

My thoughts: I enjoyed this one. I did. This isn't my first book to read on a) small pox and b) the Revolution war c) inoculations controversy. Though it has been a while since I've read up on this particular sub-sub-sub genre. It was a good read. It is the kind of historical fiction I like. The type that immerses you in the time and doesn't try to manipulate the past into an indoctrinating sermon for today. Those tend to be both a) obnoxious and b) dated.

I am torn between four and five stars. I am. I found it a compelling read. I enjoyed the depth of the characters. I thought it did really well in world-building for this historical time period. There were some great relationships explored. I'm just not absolutely convinced that it is one I would want to read again and again. (Which is almost how I determine five star reads.) Still I would definitely recommend this one. And I might revisit the rating at some point.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Week in Review #16


This week I read eight books.

38. Wonderland. Barbara O'Connor. 2018. 288 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars, mg fiction, mg realistic fiction]

Read this one if...

  • You like spunky heroines who enjoy independence and rule-breaking
  • You like dual narration (alternating narrators)
  • You enjoy inter-generational friendships

39. Vera Wong's Guide to Snooping (On A Dead Man). Jesse Q. Sutanto. 2025. 325 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, adult mystery]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy unique/memorable narrators
  • You enjoy mysteries
  • You enjoy found family stories
  • You enjoy series

40. Once for Yes. Allie Millington. 2025. 272 pages. [Source: Library] [magic realism, mg fiction, 3 stars]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy magic realism
  • You enjoy stories about grieving
  • You enjoy coming of age stories

37. Little Freddie Two Pants. Drew Daywalt. Illustrated by Lucy Ruth Cummins. 2025. 40 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, picture book, humor]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy picture books with underwear
  • You enjoy humorous stories

38. Snarky Sharky. Bethan Clarke. Illustrated by Nikolas Ilic. 2025. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, picture book, humor, animal fantasy]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy word play, puns
  • You enjoy animal fantasy


33. The Elusive Truth of Lily Temple. Joanna Davidson Politano. 2024. 400 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, historical fiction, historical romance, Christian fiction]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy historical fiction; this one is set in the early 1900s [in England] and stars a [fictional] silent film star
  • You enjoy historical mysteries
  • You enjoy historical romance
  • You enjoy Christian fiction


34. Cries from the Cross. Erwin Lutzer. 2002. Moody. 170 pages. [Source: Bought] [5 stars, christian nonfiction]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy christian living
  • You enjoy christian nonfiction
  • You enjoy seasonal devotional readings for Holy Week


35. Short-Straw Bride. Karen Witemeyer. 2012. Bethany House. 368 pages. [Source: Library]

Read this one if...

  • You enjoy historical fiction [this one is set in Texas in the 1880s I believe]
  • You enjoy historical romance [this is a marriage of convenience story]
  • You enjoy Christian fiction

Century of Viewing Week #16

1900s

  • 1900 Grandma's Reading Glasses. George Albert Smith directed this short--it's under two minutes. It blends medium shorts and close-up perspective shots. In this instance, a boy playing with his grandma's magnifying glass. One of the things he magnifies is a cat. It's fairly boring. But everything has to start somehow.
  • 1907 The Village Fire Brigade. This one is directed by James Williamson. This one is six or seven minutes. It proves there have always been 'Naughty Normans' I suppose? (Fireman Sam reference for those not in the know). I couldn't decide if it was trying to be dramatic and realistic OR a comedy sketch OR both. There's about three minutes where I'm sure it's trying to be comedy. I could only imagine what a comedy Buster Keaton could have made if he'd had a "fire brigade" machine/rig like the one used in this British film.

1910s

  • 1917 Easy Street is a Charlie Chaplin short. He plays a character who reforms and becomes a cop....but the street he's assigned is ROUGH and TOUGH and will require a lot of stamina and wit. He has a big heart...which is good...but is he tough when he needs to be. I enjoyed this one a good deal.


1920s

  • 1921 Never Weaken is a Harold Lloyd film. I did not care for it. He plays a character who 'helps' out his fiancee by bringing in 'patients' to the doctor's office where she works. His help involves injuring people and then handing them a card with the doctor's address. The middle is him trying to unalive himself since he sees 'his girl' hugging another guy and talking about getting married. The end is him realizing that it is the minister who happens to be her brother. Meanwhile, a lot of physical mishaps are occurring in a construction zone.
  • 1921 The Goat is a Buster Keaton short. He plays a character who is in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's a GREAT action-packed short. Plenty of chases. A few trains. Some acrobatics. I adore this one.
  • 1921 The Playhouse is a Buster Keaton short. This one isn't entirely politically correct, but, it's enjoyable all the same. Buster Keaton plays a stagehand. The first SIX minutes is Buster Keaton in ALL the roles on stage and off. Including ALL the audience, all the orchestra, all the acts. It was a dream. The rest is Buster Keaton hard at work...helping the show move smoothly....and filling in where necessary. It's silly. It's fun.
  • 1921 The Boat is a Buster Keaton short. I like to think of it as a sequel to One Week. He plays a husband, a father, and a boatbuilder. He's taking his family to sea...in a boat...named Damfino. Where will they end up? Damfino.
  • 1922 The Paleface is a Buster Keaton short. Is it politically correct? No. Is it funny? Yes. Could it be worse? OH yes. So he plays a butterfly/bug collector/enthusiast who stumbles onto a tribe's land....the day they find out they will be forced to move by an oil company who just stole their lease. If he survives...and this is Buster Keaton...so of course he will...his cleverness may just save the land. I LOVE the ending of this one. He finds a way to thwart the three-second kissing rule by having an intertitle card that reads TWO YEARS LATER during the kiss scene. It's adorable and fun.
  • 1922 Cops is a Buster Keaton short. Is it his most famous? Maybe. Probably. Perhaps. It is epic in the stunts and gags. The story isn't my favorite or best. So he gets into trouble with the cops after making a few poor decisions. 
  • 1926 The General. Buster Keaton stars as Johnnie Gray a man who loves two things: his train (The General) and his girl (Annabelle). Having lost one--due to miscommunication--he refuses to let the other go. When his General is kidnapped by the enemy, after he must go! He'll end up being a 'hero of the day' mostly. In a way that only Buster can be.
  • 1928 You're Darn Tootin' is a Laurel and Hardy short. It is *so* much better than Big Business (which I think I watched back in January). It was definitely tolerable. The two play musicians that are bringing the orchestra down....and they end up fired. But trying to earn money on the street has its own misadventures.


1960s

  • 1968 Yellow Submarine. The good news? Beatles songs. The bad news? Well. Psychedelic animated Beatles in a ridiculous plot. If you're in the right mood, it is fun enough. If you're not in the right mood, well, let's just say that the gag that a minute is a long time [found in the animated When I'm 64] is true indeed. This is ninety minutes with only enough entertainment value for thirty. 
  • 1969 Battle of Britain is a World War II action-drama. Don't expect characterization. It's all action--flying, landing, bombs, explosions, etc. I would like a little less action and a lot more characterization. There are moments where they try to add personal stories...but it's too little too late. In my opinion. I think some might still enjoy this one. It just didn't live up to my expectations.


1970s

  • 1973 Soylent Green. Did I love it? Did I not? I am glad I watched it....once. Knew ahead of time it was dystopia and dark....let's say. The ending was ambiguous, I thought, which I guess is how it should be? I don't have a lot of confidence in a brighter tomorrow for that society, let's say. 
  • 1974 Huckleberry Finn (the musical) Do I want my time back? Hard to answer fairly. I was disappointed that the Sherman brothers didn't deliver a better movie. I am not sure how faithful it is to the book because it's been at least five to ten years since I read it. The musical numbers weren't quite to my liking.
  • 1979 Star Trek the Motion Picture Do I think this movie needs to be edited back down for most viewers? Yes. Not everyone mind you. But this one drags SO much focusing primarily on the special effects. It might not have felt so slow and draggy when it came out. The story isn't my favorite or best. But I do love the characters in general.


1980s

  • 1988 Who Framed Roger Rabbit? Not a kids movie. But a parody of film noir with every animated character you can imagine. What I loved? ALL THE CAMEOS. What I didn't love? Roger Rabbit was annoying. It had to be intentional, obviously. I liked most of the characters and the story. It was fun/zany. I enjoyed it SO MUCH MORE than I thought I would. I am so glad I watched it.

1990s

  • 1990 Cyrano de Bergerac. I love, love, love this movie. It's a French film with English subtitles. I love the play. I love this movie. I love the musical score. Cyrano de Bergerac is in love with Roxane, his cousin, but his nose keeps him from being bold enough to speak to her earnestly. She falls in love with Christian a young man who is tongue-tied and awkward though extremely handsome supposedly. With a little help from Cyrano, Roxane will get the man of her dreams...but who does she love?
  • 1997 Men in Black. This is a fun movie to revisit. I enjoy this alien film. I love Tommy Lee Jones. It's just fun.


2000s

  • 2003 Gospel of John is one of my favorite movies to watch. It is narrated by Christopher Plummer. It is literally just the Gospel of John. I would say nothing added or subtracted. However, the online version I saw on Tubi had about four minutes of someone--not Christopher Plummer--essentially giving an altar call and explaining how to respond to the movie you just saw. I am fairly sure that this is NOT in the original movie release. It feels tacked on. It doesn't take away from the overall experience....however, I do wish it hadn't been added.
  • 2006 Paul Merton's Silent Clowns. Four episodes. About an hour each. Each one includes about twenty to twenty-five minutes of an actual silent film newly scored [musically]. Episode one was Buster Keaton. Episode two was Charlie Chaplin. Episode three, I believe, was Laurel and Hardy. Episode four was Harold Lloyd. Each one seems to include Paul Merton giving a little lecture to an audience before screening a film. Also some interviews with people who enjoy the silent comic. I enjoyed some aspects of it. I am thankful for it introducing me to You're Darn Tootin' and Easy Street. (Buster Keaton's short was THE GOAT). I did NOT like the Harold Lloyd episode at all.

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

40. Once For Yes

 

40. Once for Yes. Allie Millington. 2025. 272 pages. [Source: Library] [magic realism, mg fiction, 3 stars]

First sentence: My beginning began with a brick. Might not sound like much, but hey. We've all got to start somewhere. Brick by brick by brick, until I became a big enough box to fit people inside. Wouldn't have been my first choice. Too bad no one asked me. Almost fifty years later, and I was still full of them.

Premise/plot: Once For Yes is narrated by several characters, one of which is the apartment building itself, The Odenburgh. Primarily the narration is between the building (The Odenburgh) and Prue (from apartment 4C) with only occasional additional perspectives. Two major stories essentially collide in this one: a) Prue is mourning the loss of her sister, Lina, who died about a year before--hit by a car; b) The Odenburgh (the building) is facing demolition. The tenants have been put on notice to move within a month. The building is going down, down, and nothing can save it. The building--of course--being magical tries to communicate with Prue--more receptive than the others in the building. The problem? Prue is convinced that it is the dead Lina reaching out from beyond the grave. Can the building be saved? Should the building be saved?

My thoughts: This one is from the author of Olivetti--a novel from the perspective of a typewriter. This one had all of the same magical realism elements as Olivetti. However, the themes and tones are different. I don't know why the building impersonating a dead Lina bothers me. But it does. For better or worse. I didn't dislike this one. I just didn't love it. There's nothing wrong with merely liking something.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Monday, April 14, 2025

39. Vera Wong's Guide to Snooping

 

39. Vera Wong's Guide to Snooping (On A Dead Man). Jesse Q. Sutanto. 2025. 325 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, adult mystery]

First sentence: Vera Wong Zhuzhu should be having the time of her life. She is, in fact, having the most wonderful, lovely, delightful time. Today, like every day, she wakes up at four thirty in the morning and jettisons out of bed like an army general with a new troop of terrified soldiers to scream at. And today, like every day, she puts on her gear, protecting every inch of her skin from the sun, and bustles out of the house to go on her extremely aggressive morning walk.

Premise/plot: Vera Wong is back for her second novel. (The first novel was Vera Wong's Unsolicited Advice for Murderers). Characters from the first novel are present--and play significant roles--in the second. So do read the books in order. In this one, after falling for a phone scam, she meets a troubled young woman outside a police station. She soon finds herself snooping again...not knowing at the start if it is a missing person case or another murder. She soon rounds up a long list of suspects to befriend...and to investigate. 

My thoughts: I LOVE both books. I don't know that I absolutely love, love, love the series. But both books are SO enjoyable, SO fun, SUCH a treat. Highly recommend if you enjoy MYSTERIES with a heavy dose of humor.



© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

38. Wonderland

 

38. Wonderland. Barbara O'Connor. 2018. 288 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars, mg fiction, mg realistic fiction]

First sentence: Mavis Jeeter sat on the bus stop bench beside her mother and whispered goodbye to Hadley, Georgia. She took a deep breath and let out a big, heaving sigh to send a signal to her mother that she was tired of saying goodbye.

Premise/plot: Mavis Jeeter hates the fact that her mother keeps them on the move all the time. Mavis has never been settled in one place long enough to have an actual best friend. Her mom has a new job--as a housekeeper--and they have a new house--in an apartment above the Tully's garage. But will she find a best friend? Maybe. Maybe not. Rose Tully is left speechless by the arrival of Mavis and her mother (their new housekeeper). Mavis has forcefully announced that they will be the absolute best of friends. Rose-- who is in need of a best friend agrees--but what choice does she have? Mavis--as she soon learns--doesn't take no for an answer. Rose is soon spilling it all: Mr. Duffy--the gatekeeper of their gated community--has recently lost his dog, Queenie, and he is now sad, moody, unwilling to entertain her on the side. Mavis announces that she will help Rose cheer him up and they will do so by finding him a new dog. But is it just that easy?

My thoughts: I do have THOUGHTS. Conflicting thoughts. On the positive side, all the characters have flaws which means that they are fleshed out enough to be human. Another positive is that the characterization is not just centered on Mavis and Rose alone. While not all side characters are deeply, deeply fleshed out, ALL of them feel fleshed out enough that it is easy enough to put yourself in their shoes and see the world through their eyes. This goes for the adult characters as well which is rare in middle grade fiction. However, I didn't love this one absolutely. I found Mavis to be problematic. Of course this is subjective. I've read reviews on GoodReads that love, love, love Mavis and dislike Rose.

Mavis to me comes across as TROUBLE. She's bossy. She's inconsiderate. She doesn't read the room. She doesn't listen...at all. She doesn't accept people as they are. Of course, there are plenty of adults who haven't learned these skills, so perhaps it's a little much to expect a fifth grader to have them. Still. Friendship would go smoother if she would actually listen, be less bossy, take the time to understand. I also think she's trouble because she encourages Rose to break the rules. All the rules. The more significant keep-people-safe rules and the smaller rules. She tells Rose that breaking rules will make her brave and more grown up. Rose is easily coaxed into pushing past all her own boundaries of what feels safe and right and good AND push past the rules her parents have put in place to keep her safe. 

The big rule in question is leaving the estates/gated community AND crossing a busy highway on bicycles. As an adult, all I can say is that Mavis is a bad influence! And Rose at least has no business crossing highways on a bicycle. 

Mr. Duffy. What I have to say about him is that I think what neither girl seems to recognize is that a) it's more than the grief of a dog. Mr. Duffy is a widower. He's old. He lives alone. He's aware--even if the girls aren't--that he's getting older and less capable. And b) yes, the adults in the community could be more polite in voicing their concerns....it seems that Mr. Duffy IS at the point where he is mentally and physically incapable of doing the job he was hired for. He does seem to be showing signs of dementia.

Rose. Out of all the characters I love Rose most. It is not that she is perfectly-perfect. She's not. But she seems to be the kindest and sweetest and the most concerned with how others are feeling. I'm not sure that Rose and Mavis are actually well suited for one another....since Mavis seems to be temperamental, dramatic, bossy, and incapable of listening.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Week in Review #15


This week I reviewed eight books.

36. All Creatures Great and Small. James Herriot. 1972. 437 pages. [Source: Library] [semi-autobiographical, adult fiction, animals; 5 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy semi-autobiographical, fictionalized stories
  • You enjoy rural animal stories
  • You enjoy storytellers with a gift for words (the HOW it is told more than the WHAT is told)
  • You want to read the book the iconic show is based on

37. The Worthing Saga. Orson Scott Card. 1990. Tor. 465 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, adult science fiction, short stories, framework stories]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy science fiction and fantasy
  • You enjoy stories with deeply flawed characters (extremely well-fleshed out characters, characters that stick with you, but essentially flawed and very human)
  • You enjoy stories with a unique framework
  • You enjoy your science fiction with a big dose of meaning-of-life questions

33. Board book: Runaway Blanket. Nancy Deas. 2025. 22 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, board book, bedtime book]

Read this if...

  • You have little ones and are looking for another bedtime book

34. Board book: This Dog. That Dog. Jade Orlando. 2025. 24 pages. [Source: Library] [dogs, pets, board book, 5 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy reading board books
  • You enjoy reading books about dogs
  • You enjoy concept books about opposites

35. Touch and Feel: Baby Animals with tactiles for toddlers to explore. (Board book) DK. 2025. 12 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars] [interactive, touch and feel]

Read this if....

  • You enjoy board books
  • You are looking for a recently published touch and feel books with baby animals
  • You don't mind all the textures being the same

36. Board book: Richard Scarry's Bunnies. Richard Scarry. 1976/2025. 26 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, bunnies, board book]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy RICHARD SCARRY
  • You like bunnies
  • You like vintage books


31. Faith (Brides of the West #1) Lori Copeland. 1998/2020. 320 pages. [Source: Library] [audio book, christian fiction, historical romance, two stars]

Read this if....

  • It's a hoopla borrow and you are not picky (that's why I checked it out)
  • You enjoy mail order bride stories (and are not picky about how good they are)
  • You are inattentive to details and are not weighed down with overthinking about what you are reading


32. And the Beagles and the Bunnies Shall Lie Down Together. Charles M. Schulz. 1984. 100ish pages. [Source: Gift] [4 stars, comic strips, theology]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy Peanuts
  • You enjoy theology
  • You don't mind the inclusion of Halloween as a subject
  • You love LINUS especially

Century of Viewing Week #15

1910s

  • 1919 Backstage. I love, love, love this one. Roscoe Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have a show to put on....with very little notice. When the star attraction walks out angry--with good reason--the two have a show to save. The show they perform may or may not be wonderful....however this short is. Plenty of mishaps on stage...and Buster gets the chance to shine.
  • 1919 The Hayseed. Arbuckle/Keaton short. Of their latest shorts, this is the most forgettable perhaps? Maybe just because the others were so stand-out memorable. This one has a rural setting. I can't remember if it's a general store and/or post office? They deliver the mail, I believe. Or maybe that's Buster's job? Anyway, there's a villain who's trying to frame Roscoe's character....and there are a lot of onions to be eaten.

1920s

  • 1920 The Garage Roscoe Arbuckle and Buster Keaton's last short together. I LOVE this one so much. It has some of my favorite gags in it. I love how buddy-buddy it feels. So the two are working side by side at a garage as mechanics....and as firemen.
  • 1920 One Week Buster Keaton's first SHORT to be released. This is one of my all-time favorite shorts. It's SWEET, adorable, and FUNNY. A newlywed couple faces all of life's hardest stresses all within the course of one week as they build their first home together--out of a box-kit. A former rival has mis-numbered the boxes and chaos results. The weather is not kind either! Will these two survive their first week of marriage?
  • 1920 The Saphead. This is Buster Keaton's FIRST feature film. He was loaned out to another studio to do this movie. This was his first time to be a FEATURE star...as in not a sidekick. He plays the son of a wealthy man...who's trying to win the love of his life BY following the advice of a silly book. The book tells him that the modern girl ONLY loves bad boys. Drink. Gamble. Waste away your day. Stay out all night. Have a string of girls...etc. However, Bertie can't help being GOOD and wanting to say his prayers every day. What a relief that *his* girl is not a 'modern girl' and she loves him EXACTLY the way he is....the problem....HIS father still doesn't approve and puts up obstacles. Still it is his no-good brother-in-law who may just ruin his chance for happiness.....
  • 1920 Convict 13. Buster Keaton is a golfer.....who ends up having a weird dream sequence. It is not my favorite or best. HOWEVER it does have its enjoyable moments. This one, I believe, uses some of the gags that he used to do on vaudeville (the whole table act with him throwing around a basketball on a rope). It has its funny moments for sure. And I do like aspects of it.
  • 1920 The Scarecrow. Buster Keaton is a farm hand smitten with the farmer's daughter. However there is another rival for her affection. (Well, she is NOT in any way interested in the other guy.) This one has many, many merry and not-so-merry chases around the farm. It is FUN and SILLY and WONDERFUL. I absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE how this one resolves. The last half of this one is just magical.
  • 1920 Neighbors. Buster Keaton's character is head over heels in love with the girl next door--woman next door, let's be clear. The families HATE each other. There seems to be no way for these two to marry without causing major DRAMA. But that won't stop these two from trying....and the judge marrying them is a good sport.
  • 1921 The Haunted House. I am not sure if The Haunted House or One Week was my first *short* to watch with Buster. But OH how much difference time makes. I didn't *love* this one the first time around. Now I adore it oh-so-much. I do. I truly do. Buster Keaton plays a BANK CLERK who is having a BAD DAY. He ends up in a haunted house--aka the secret hideout for a gang of counterfeiters.
  • 1921 Hard Luck. Buster Keaton short. This one is definitely not my favorite or best. He plays a man down on his luck who is trying to un-end himself. Of course he doesn't have any luck. This is a comedy after all. He has some misadventures--including going fishing, going hunting, and doing some high diving. This one does have a BEAR. There's a long sequence where Buster has to get up on a horse many, many, many times. He finds a different way to mount each time, plenty of comedic moments. The fishing scene was also humorous. Still the story isn't my favorite or best.
  • 1921 High Sign I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this Buster Keaton short. I do. It was his first to film independently--without Roscoe. It was not his first to release. It is a good bridge between the two periods of his career, I believe. It is 1000% silly. It is extremely surreal. Buster plays a man who is hired to be both a HIT MAN (by the Blinking Buzzards) and a bodyguard (by a father and daughter). He soon realizes that he's being paid to kill the man he's being paid to protect. It is silly. It is fun. It grows on you. Granted you might not be at the point where you'll watch the same short half a dozen times in a month or two, but, this one has grown on me so much.
  • 1926 The General. My favorite Buster Keaton film. My steady Friday night commitment. I watched the William Perry soundtrack The General. I am still open to revisiting the Carl Davis one which I watched for the first time last week. So the plot? (As if you didn't know if you've been keeping up with my blog this year at all) Johnnie Gray loves TWO things--his train, The General, and his girl, Annabelle. When both are kidnapped by the enemy--Northerner spies--Johnnie Gray will risk everything to get them back. 

1950s

  • 1952 April in Paris Doris Day and Ray Bolger star in this musical. He works for the government--an assistant to the undersecretary of the secretary of something or other. (There's a song because of course there's a song). He was supposed to invite a famous actress to this convention in Paris, France, but he accidentally invites Ethel "Dynamite" Jackson (Doris Day's character, I believe that's her stage name?). On the cruise ship, these two do a little after-hour partying/dancing (in the kitchen) and decide they *must* marry on the spot...but will their marriage last. Ray Bolger comes across as a Buster Keaton clone in this one. His mannerisms, his expressions, EVERYTHING seems to be so Buster. I know, I know, I know that I might be seeing Buster where another wouldn't. But his facial expressions are so spot-on for being Buster. Except, of course, he's much taller.

1960s

  • 1967 Doctor, You've Got To Be Kidding. Sandra Dee and George Hamilton star in this one. She plays a young woman whose mother risks it all for her daughter to have a chance at becoming a singer, a somebody. She is content to be a secretary who sings for fun with her friends and family. Her boss--George Hamilton's character--is an egomaniac. Yet apparently he's so charismatic that she finds him irresistible...at least for one night. This romantic comedy has her pregnant out of wedlock with three friends willing to step in and say I do.....

1990s

  • 1995 Babe. Apparently while other people my age were watching Empire Records [and Clueless], I was watching Babe. (Though to be fair, I was a big fan of Clueless.) Babe is super-quotable, and at least for me so iconic. Babe, a pig, finds his place in the world. Lots of FOUND FAMILY. It is precious and adorable. Singing mice.
  • 1995 Empire Records I don't know *how* I missed this movie. But I had. It wasn't until everyone seemed to be posting about Rex Manning day that I became curious enough to seek this one out. IT was definitely entertaining and I can see why it has a following. I can see why if you grew up watching this one, it might be one you quoted often. I liked it. I would definitely be open to seeing it again. Though I'm not sure it will be an again-again-again-again thing. But once a year on Rex Manning day....I might could do that so long as it's streaming free. [I watched on Pluto] The plot??? It follows a group of coworkers over a twenty-four hour period. They work at EMPIRE RECORDS. Each one has his/her own worries/concerns. Rex Manning, a musician, will be visiting the store [on his tour] signing albums, etc.

2020s

  • 2023 Alien Intervention. This is a low-budget, slightly-different alien movie. It is set in 1967/1992. An alien visits a young desert girl and asks her to hide his glowing blue stone for safekeeping since he's just minutes away from being apprehended by the men in black, let's say. He returns for the stone twenty-five years later...she's still in the desert....and her life is in the dumps. She needs....wait for it....an alien intervention....to gain perspective on life. This one was character-driven and thoughtful. I don't know that I absolutely love it. HOWEVER, it was definitely worth watching.
  • 2025 Cinderella's Castle. This is a Team StarKid musical production. I'm not sure if it was *filmed* in 2025, but released on YouTube in 2025...it was. This is a darkly comedic [sometimes crude] adaptation of Cinderella...if Cinderella had skin-wearing trolls as villains. I was very conflicted as I was watching this one. On the one hand, some of the songs are super-catchy and the puppet work for some of the characters was just working for me. On the other hand, some of it is just distasteful, intentionally so. It is DARK and disturbing in some ways. But extremely light and silly in others. I did like the resolution. I know that if I coaxed myself to watch it a second time, I'd probably have the songs grow on me more and convince myself that I like it. I don't necessarily want to. I know that it won't be on YouTube forever and it was quite crude in places.


© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Tuesday, April 08, 2025

37. The Worthing Saga

  

37. The Worthing Saga. Orson Scott Card. 1990. Tor. 465 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, adult science fiction, short stories, framework stories]

First sentence: In many places in the Peopled Worlds, the pain came suddenly in the midst of the day's labor. It was as if an ancient and comfortable presence left them, one that they had never noticed until it was gone, and no one knew what to make of it at first, though all knew at once that something had changed deep at the heart of the world.   

ETA: I think this is the fourth time I've reviewed it for Becky's Book Reviews. I listened on audio book this time around. IT was mostly great. I absolutely love the first half--the framework stories. The short stories are hit and miss. I like some of them a LOT...and I detest/loathe others. The book as a whole is one that sticks with me vividly.

 Premise/plot: Imagine living in a world where there is no pain, no suffering, no grief, no fear, no anger, no violence, no injury. Wrong actions, in a sense, have ceased to have consequences. If a person were to hurt himself/herself chopping wood or tending the fires, then there would be instant--almost magical--healing. Even morally wrong actions are prevented, on this world there are no children out of wedlock; and the child is always the husband's never the lover's if you're an adulteress. Yes, there is an occasional death, but never for the very young, never for the able-bodied. It is hard to imagine for us this life of easy contentment. A life with no struggles? A life truly worry-free? A world where fire doesn't burn you and ice doesn't freeze you? Surely there must be a catch, right? Some reason why this world isn't a perfect paradise...

The change came in the middle of the night. Imagine going to bed with everything being quite all right, and waking up to find that life is not what you thought it was. Pain. Grief. Suffering. Worry. Fear. Anger. And it wasn't just emotional, as the village learned. It was physical, too. As one accident after another occurred, the villagers soon realized that they could not only be hurt, but they could also DIE. With the whole village (and indeed the whole world) in confusion, no one knows quite what to think. Is God dead? If God is still watching over them, why then is there suffering? Why suffering after all these centuries of watchful care? Folks are going along muttering that God doesn't look out for them anymore.

The old clerk trembled and nodded and his voice quivered as he spoke. 'I have read the books of ancient times,' he began, and all eyes turned to him. 'I have read the books of ancient times, and in them the old ones spoke of wounds that bleed like slaughtered cattle, and great griefs when the living suddenly are dead, and anger that turns to blows among people. But that was long, long ago, when men were still animals, and God was young and inexperienced. (5-6)

Yes, no one understands this Day of Pain. Least of all, Lared, our young hero. But it is Lared who will become the chosen speaker that will write the story and tell the tales that will explain this Day and give it meaning. Two strangers come to the inn, the inn that Lared's parents own, and it is Lared and his sister, Sala, who befriend them. Jason. Justice. A man and woman. The two are mysterious, no doubt about it, and more than one person suspects that they're coming is linked with the Day of Pain.

The two share their stories mostly through dreams and waking visions. Jason will occasionally share one the old-fashioned way, but most are transmitted directly into Lared's mind. Lared doesn't know what to think. He doesn't like the dreams. He doesn't like the uneasy feelings they leave him with...but he also knows that he has been called, chosen, if you will, to write this down. To record them. It is not his place to understand everything, just to write it down as it's been given to him.

Lared and his village provide the framework for the stories that Jason and Justice share. It is a story of two men, one empire, and one powerful drug.

Abner Doon. A name that still strikes fear in people thousands of years after his death. Some even say that he was the devil himself. But was he really? His name is associated with death and destruction, and in some ways, it is easy to understand why. He caused the death and destruction of the EMPIRE. The very arrogant, often corrupt, very stagnant empire. But was the fall of the empire really that bad? Wasn't it better for humanity in general? Jason Worthing certainly thinks so.

Jason Worthing. Another name that people fear to speak aloud. Why? It is a name of reverence. Many people feel that Jason Worthing is God. The creator of life. The sustainer of the universe, even. But was he really? Yes, he had a hand in establishing life and building civilization, at least on one planet, but the creator of all life? No. Just an ordinary man with unusual psychic powers who came from a technologically advanced society.

The empire. It's not that the empire was completely evil. Sure the empire had its fair share of corrupt and power-hungry politicians. More than its fair share. Every branch of the empire had its corrupt officials. And there was nothing that couldn't be bought--as long as you had money. But that wasn't the real crime of the empire. The real crime was that humanity was being robbed of its very soul, its very essence. They had lost the point of living. They were corrupting the very nature of our existence.

Somec. Perhaps the most powerful drug the empire had ever known. What did it do? It put the user into a deep sleep, a coma, if you will. First, the user would have his/her memories downloaded or recorded, if you will, onto a tape or into a bubble. I forget quite how they did it. I just know that there was a way of downloading and uploading memory. Then the assistant would inject somec. It wasn't a pretty picture. It burned. It hurt. It caused severe physical problems--sweating, discomfort, pain--but the user would forever be unaware of it because the memories would never include this part of the experience. Who was it for? At first, it was just for starship pilots. Their skills would be needed throughout a long voyage. And if a trip took hundreds or perhaps thousands of years, then they'd need Somec to function. The computer would always be able to wake them up in case of an emergency. But they'd arrive at their destination intact. So for colonization vessels, it really couldn't be any better. A ship would carry three hundred or so passengers and all the supplies needed to create and establish a civilization on another planet. So there were a few valid uses of the drug, I suppose. But the real corruption began when somec became a common necessity for the people.

Imagine the possibility of immortality. Somec offered immortality. The wealthy. The elite. The powerful. The brilliant minds of society were all given the chance for immortality. The more valuable society deemed you, the longer you would sleep between waking cycles. The common people lived and died naturally enough. But a good portion of society, became obsessed with immortality. But is living a thousand years natural if you spend 70% of it or so asleep? What does it accomplish really? You're not able to have friendships with others unless you're on the same sleep cycle. You're not able to maintain family relationships either. People could theoretically outlive their great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren. Love becomes to a certain extent irrelevant. Most things become irrelevant. No time for the finer things in life. Love. Romance. Music. Art. For not only do most people spend most of their times asleep, what little time they're awake they're obsessed with power, money, fame, greed, control. They always want more, more, more. Never content. There is no longer any joy in living life. But really too few people notice what they're missing. Except for one. The aforementioned Abner Doon.

Abner "rescues" Jason, if you will, and offers him a chance to become a part of something great. Jason becomes a starship pilot, a very famous starship pilot, and he eventually leads a colonization ship. Abner's big plan--besides the fall of the Empire--is to recreate life as it used to be. His plan? To spread humanity throughout the galaxy. To have human civilizations sprout up on thousands of planets. He knows that with the fall of the Empire, with the fall of technology, it will be thousands upon thousands of years before ANY civilization becomes advanced enough for star flight. He sees this as a way for humanity to wipe the slate clean and begin anew.

The Worthing Saga is the story of Jason's planet. How Jason "fathered" or "created" that world. And what happened to its inhabitants. What happened to his descendants. All these stories--and there are many--span thousands of years. Everything is leading the reader back to Lared. Back to the Day of Pain.

The Worthing Saga contains the previously published The Worthing Chronicle and nine short stories.

My Thoughts: Worthing Saga is one of my favorite, favorite books. And my FAVORITE Card novel. (Though I love Ender's Game and Speaker for the Dead.) The Worthing Saga is about the meaning of life. It is about what it means to be human. It asks important questions. It goes where few novels do. It asks what the meaning of pain and suffering is. It asks what the meaning of struggles are. It is ethical in nature. It asks the hard questions. But it is philosophical as well.

I love the world-building. I find the three settings within the book to be fascinating. (There is Lared's home planet which is the present-day setting; there is Capital, the planet from Jason Worthing's memory and stories, Capital becomes "real" to Lared as he experiences Worthing's memories through dreams; there is Worthing, the planet that Jason colonized with a handful of colonists thousands of years before the novel opens, again this planet becomes "real" to Lared as he experiences other people's memories through Justice, Jason's descendant.) Readers get a taste of all these societies and communities. Capital is decadent and immoral and corrupt. It is obsessed with the notion of eternity--of living forever. It "lives forever" by drug use. Somec. You might be under Somec--asleep--for anywhere from one year to ten years, and then awake for anywhere from one day (like the Empress) to three years. But somec disrupts EVERYTHING good and natural about life. An example of the decadence and immorality can be seen in the "lifeloops." People filming/recording their "real" lives for everyone to watch. Most--if not all lifeloops--are graphic in nature. It's hard not to be disgusted by the depiction. (For example, one actress complaining to her agent that he better not hire any seven year old boys for her next film.) Closely connected to the world-building, is the mythology of it. How Abner Doon's name lives on. He IS the devil. How Jason Worthing's name lives on. How people see him as being GOD. Both men are very much human, having strengths and weaknesses, being oh-so-fallible. But they have become collectively so much more than that. They've lost their humanity. Truth has been shaped and reshaped too many times to allow for them to be just human.

I love the characterization. I love getting to know Lared, Sala, Jason, and Justice. Not to mention all the men and women from the memories and stories. (I have a soft spot for Hoom.) I love the storytelling. I love the dialogue. I love how everything is layered together. How the story all comes together. How Lared slowly but surely pieces things together and comes to understand--if understand is the right word--the world. Card's characters are so very human, so vulnerable, so fallible. Readers see humans at their best and at their absolute worst within The Worthing Saga. Moments of compassion and redemption make it so worth while.


I love the ideas. I love the depth and substance. That is not to say that I agree absolutely with every single philosophical idea within the book. But it goes places most fiction doesn't. It asks real questions, tough questions. It explores ideas. One also sees the consequences (or possible consequences) of ideas. But it encourages you to think about deep things, to explore questions like why is there pain? why is there suffering? would the world be a better place without pain, without suffering? Is pain a necessary evil? Do we only feel joy and happiness because we know about pain and sorrow? what makes life beautiful? do we become better people through our struggles with life?


I do enjoy the framework. The Worthing Chronicle (1982) makes up half of The Worthing Saga. This is THE story with Lared being visited by Jason and Justice shortly after the day of pain disrupts his community. (It really is a haunting opening.) The second half of the book consists of short stories. Most of these short stories were written years before The Worthing Chronicle and were previously published. Tales of Capitol (1979): "Skipping Stones," "Second Chance," "Lifeloop," "Breaking the Game," "Killing Children," and "What Will We Do Tomorrow." Tales from the Forest of Waters (1990, 1980): "Worthing Farm," "Worthing Inn," and "The Tinker." Of these stories, I find Skipping Stones, Second Chance, and Breaking the Game to be most memorable. After you've read these stories, you almost need to go back and reread the first section. I'm not sure you can fully appreciate the book without rereading it a few times and absorbing it. Most of the stories--but certainly not all of them--are emotional. I love that the book is a book to be EXPERIENCED. 

ETA: YET I do have to say that I don't absolutely love everything. Some of the stories are EXTREMELY graphic and disturbing...one might even say disgusting. Not all of the stories. Not even most of the stories. And they are there to show the corruption and sickness of what humanity has become...so I guess they somewhat serve a purpose. Yet this one is distasteful in places.

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews