Showing posts with label 1794. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1794. Show all posts

Thursday, August 02, 2012

Lady Susan

Lady Susan. Jane Austen 1794?/1871. 64 pages.

I recently reread Jane Austen's Lady Susan. I remembered it as being a quick, light read full of gossip and scandal. Lady Susan Vernon is not a "nice" woman; she's a still-quite-beautiful widow with a near-grown daughter, Frederica, who sometimes forgets her place. After creating a mess--or scandal--she invites herself to her brother-in-law's estate. Of course, she's not completely honest about it--not admitting that it is her last resort and that she really has no interest in his company or the company of his wife, Catherine Vernon. If readers get an honest glimpse of the woman at all, it is in her letters to Alicia Johnson, but, even then I think she's not being completely honest all of the time.

Lady Susan is a tricky, manipulative woman who likes to keep her options open. The other women that readers get to know in this little novel are Catherine and Frederica. Catherine would find it difficult to say anything positive about her sister-in-law, Lady Susan. Though she could probably admit that Lady Susan is quite beautiful and charming--when she wants to be. Catherine thinks Lady Susan is a horrible mother--and she is. And Catherine thinks she is PLOTTING to get her brother, Reginald De Courcy--and she is. Reginald starts strong, but, within a day or two he's convinced that Lady Susan is THE ONE. In other words, he becomes horribly stupid. Frederica, Catherine's daughter, also falls for Reginald. Lady Susan is all about DRAMA. Gossip. Scandal. Lies. Manipulation. Tension. Lady Susan is a divisive woman--breaking apart families, the cause of endless quarrels. 

Lady Susan isn't really like Austen's other novels. Lady Susan, Catherine, and Frederica aren't really like Jane Austen's other heroines. And that is definitely true with the heroes as well. Reginald is not like Tilney, Darcy, Wentworth, or Knightley. Lady Susan is not a swoon-worthy romance. It is fun, lively, gossipy. 

Here's my first review.

My favorite quotes:
Where there is a disposition to dislike, a motive will never be wanting. (7)
In short, when a person is always to deceive, it is impossible to be consistent. (27)
Facts are such horrid things! (54)

Read Lady Susan
  • If you are looking for a classic that is a quick, lively read
  • If you like stories where what is not being said is just as important as what is being said
  • If you like not-so-nice heroines; true Lady Susan is no Moll Flanders, but, she's no Fanny Price either! She just really, really likes it when men--single or married--fall in love with her.
  • If you like Jane Austen

© 2012 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Friday, September 11, 2009

Lady Susan


Austen, Jane. 1871* Lady Susan. (Around 80 pages.)

Think Austen is all about being prim and proper? Think Austen is boring? Well, just you read Lady Susan. Lady Susan has several things going for it. It's short for one thing. Just 41 little letters. (Yes, this is one of those books told through letters.) Just the right length for one or two afternoons. But perhaps even more importantly, it's different from what you might expect. It's fun. It's lively. It's snappy.
Sometimes what is not being said is half the fun. What's going on between the lines.

Here is one of my favorite lines: "Where there is a disposition to dislike, a motive will never be wanting."

Lady Susan Vernon. The woman every woman loves to hate. And not without reason! She'll come to visit and try to steal your husband and your daughter's beau** all in the same trip. Just ask Mrs. Mainwaring. When this novel opens, Lady Susan is making a hasty retreat. She'd been staying--along with her daughter, Frederica, with the Mainwarings. But Mrs. Mainwaring has had just about enough of her. What with Lady Susan encouraging Mr. Mainwaring and Mr. James Martin. She's telling everyone who will listen to beware. So Lady Susan writes a letter to her dear brother. She'd just love to come and stay with him and his wife, Catherine, at Churchill.

When gossip arrives just ahead of her visit, why she'll come up with every excuse in the book as to why everyone else has got it wrong. She flirting with Mr. James Martin? And her only a few months a widow? Well, she was just trying to secure him for her daughter. And Mr. Mainwaring? Well, that's just a lie. Would she be receiving letters from Mrs. Mainwaring if the rumors were true?*** Fortunately, for the reader--and to the great entertainment of all--Lady Susan tells the truth to her dear friend, Alicia Johnson.

Catherine Vernon. The sister-in-law of Lady Susan. She can't stand "Lady" Susan. At all. She writes to her family--her mother mainly--the de Courcys. (We're also privy to the mother's letters--Lady de Courcy.) Catherine is really regretting the fact that Catherine's visit happens to coincide with her brother's visit. Reginald De Courcy is dumb, dumb, dumb when it comes to women.

Alicia Johnson. A kindred spirit to Lady Susan. Or so we're led to believe. She loves to flirt and carry on as much as her friend, or does she? (She's a married woman. So technically, she shouldn't be acting like a wild woman.) Is there enough room in the world for these two sillies?

As Reginald begins to seek Lady Susan--he feels himself truly, madly, deeply in love--will Lady Susan's past come back to haunt her? Is there anything hidden (or not so hidden) in her life that will dampen Reginald's affections?

While men enter into the story--quite passively in a way--this one is all about women. There aren't any Henry Tilneys, Fitzwilliam Darcys, Colonel Brandons, or Captain Wentworths around for female readers to swoon over. This isn't a traditional romance. This isn't a oh-love-is-wonderful, let's-all-live-happily-ever-after piece. If Pride and Prejudice can be likened to Much Ado About Nothing, I'd say Lady Susan is more like A Midsummer Night's Dream. Where love is more lust, and where men and women are more foolish than wise.

So why would I recommend this one? Well, I think it's fun. I think the very fact that it is so short and yet so lively and entertaining works in its favor. I think it's a lot less intimidating than her other books.

*Written in the 1790s, possibly 1794. But not published until 1871.
**Or is that Miss Mainwaring a niece not a daughter? I can't remember and since they share the same last name, it's difficult to remember.
***The letters are in fact from Mr. Mainwaring. Whenever she receives a letter from him, she proclaims it from his wife. I don't think she's reading these aloud and passing them around.

© Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews