Jeannie's Demise: Abortion on Trial in Victorian Ontario. Ian Radforth. 2020. [October] 258 pages. [Source: Review copy] [adult nonfiction; history]
First sentence: Growing
impatient, Lovell took an axe and broke open the box. Inside he found
some straw, a white chemise, and the naked body of a young woman. A few
hours later, Coroner E.C. Fisher held an inquest nearby at Mrs. Mantle’s
Robin Hood Hotel on Dundas Street. Two physicians, who had already
performed a post-mortem examination of the body, reported that the
deceased was an otherwise robust and healthy woman whose death was
caused by a violent abortion. The jury at the inquest concluded that
there had been a wilful murder of “an unknown woman” by some “person or
persons unknown.”
Premise/plot: Jeannie's Demise is an
up-close-and-personal, behind-the-scenes glimpse at abortion on trial in
Ontario Canada in 1875. In the summer of that year, Jeannie Gilmour got
an abortion and died as a result of complications. That fall and winter
her two abortionists--husband and wife--went on trial. This news story
was covered widely and broadly. (Though for the record, the two were on
trial for murdering Jeannie and not for murdering the unborn child.) The
book chronicles the case in great depth giving background and context.
My
thoughts: I love a good true crime book occasionally. This one fits
into that category nicely enough. It is a detailed accounting of three
trials: the first trial being that of the two accused abortionists
(abortion was illegal in 1875), the second trial being that of the
accused seducer, the third being that of a man accused of helping
dispose of the body via a coffin in a wagon. Readers get a glimpse of
how the police department worked the case, how the prosecution and
defense handled the case, the evidence, the testimonies and witnesses.
One also definitely got a glimpse of how the media reacted to the case
AND influenced the case. One also saw some statistics.
If the
book had kept this a book about the past, it perhaps would have set
better with me. One could read about the facts of the case--in the
past--without trying to moralize, preach, or reveal a modern AGENDA to
the case.
It wasn't until the last page or possibly two that the
pro-choice cause is championed and glorified. He leaves readers with a
warning that there are some in the United States that want to rob women
of their oh-so-human right to have access to abortions.
I think
both pro-life and pro-choice readers can agree that illegal abortions
can be dangerous and risky to women. But to be fair, in 1875 legal or
illegal abortion would have been risky. As was childbirth itself it
1875. There was so much about germs and bacteria and care that doctors,
midwives, nurses, the general public did not know that lives were put at
risk. Medicine has come a long way since the nineteenth century.
© 2020 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment