Friday, December 04, 2009

Wilkie Collins: Man and Wife


Collins, Wilkie. 1870. Man and Wife. 688 pages.

On a summer's morning, between thirty and forty years ago, two girls were crying bitterly in the cabin of an East Indian passenger ship, bound outward, from Gravesend to Bombay.

No matter how you look at it, Man and Wife is a strange and often uneven novel. Definitely melodramatic. As complicated as any modern soap opera.

Anne and Blanche are best friends. Their mothers--also named Anne and Blanche--were also best friends. (Though both mothers are dead by the time this story really gets started. Perhaps that is why these two--now of marriageable age--cling to one another so fiercely.) But this friendship is about to be tested. And not just a little bit. Anne, out of necessity or "duty" is about to separate herself (perhaps forever) from her closest friend. Foolishly, Anne gave into temptation with Geoffrey Delamayn, and is now reaping the consequences. She's pregnant. And she's trying to push her lover into marriage. Reminding him of all that he's said and done. How he owes her and his unborn child. The two arrange to meet at an inn and pose as man and wife. She wants--of course--for the marriage to take place soon after. But before Geoffrey can arrive (but after Anne's already run away), he receives notice that his father is ill--perhaps dying. He's needed at home. In London, I believe. So he convinces his friend, Arnold Brinkworth, to go in his place. To deliver a note to Anne. But to do this, he has to tell a few white lies to the landlady. To say he is the young lady's husband. (Arnold, for the record, is newly engaged. He's in love with Blanche.) This makes both uncomfortable. Neither likes the deceit. And both would undo this day if they could. But what's done is done, right?

This book is set in Scotland and England. And it concerns the Scottish marriage laws of the time. (Irregular little marriages including marriage by declaration and marriage by correspondence.) It's an integral part of the plot and much too complex to try to explain here. But these vacationing characters get into quite a mess by the end of it!

I mentioned that the book was strange. Perhaps that's not quite the word for it. The book tackles so many different topics. Scottish marriage laws. Marriage in general. The lack of women's rights. (How if a woman is a wife then she is the property of her husband. It doesn't matter how evil and cruel and drunk and abusive he is. She is his for life to do with as he pleases.) Society itself. The 'dangers' of sports and athleticism. Perhaps it is the attack on sports--the correlation Collins makes between moral depravity and physical fitness--that stands out as most strange. Geoffrey Delamayn is quite an athlete, a sportsman, he prides himself on his physique. He exercises and trains. He does various sports--including running. And Collins argues that all the energy Delamayn is putting into sports is ruining him mind, body, and soul.

The book is definitely didactic in places. And not just about sports. The other causes taken up within the book--particularly marriage and how women should have rights even if they are married--are a bit more welcome to readers though. But before you champion Collins as being completely enlightened and wonderful, you have to wrestle with passages like these:

However persistently the epicene theorists of modern times may deny it, it is nevertheless a truth plainly visible in the whole past history of the sexes that the natural condition of a woman is to find her master in a man. Look in the face of any woman who is in no direct way dependent on a man: and, as certainly as you see the sun in a cloudless sky, you see a woman is not happy. The want of a master is their great unknown want; the possession of a master is--unconsciously to themselves--the only possible completion of their lives. (chapter 31)
Still, you've got to weigh the good with the bad. And there are some places where the writing shines out for its wit, charm, and truth. (It is the nature of Truth to struggle to the light.) ("Our little besetting sins!" she said. "What slaves we are to our little besetting sins!")

Here is a little love scene between Arnold and Blanche:

[Blanche] could have boxed Arnold on both ears for being so unreasonably afraid of her.
"Well," she said impatiently, "if I did look in your face, what should I see?"
Arnold made another plunge. He answered: "You would see that I want a little encouragement."
"From me?"
"Yes--if you please."

Blanche looked back over her shoulder. The summer-house stood on an eminence, approached by steps. The players on the lawn beneath were audible, but not visible. Any one of them might appear, unexpectedly, at a moment's notice. Blanche listened. There was no sound of approaching footsteps--there was a general hush, and then another bang of the mallet on the ball and then a clapping of hands. Sir Patrick was a privileged person. He had been allowed, in all probability to try again; and he was succeeding at the second effort. This implied a reprieve of some seconds. Blanche looked back again at Arnold.

"Consider yourself encouraged," she whispered and instantly added, with the ineradicable female instinct of self-defense, "within limits!"

Arnold made a last plunge--straight to the bottom, this time.

"Consider yourself loved," he burst out, "without any limits at all."
So the book has its strengths and weaknesses. I mentioned some of the weaknesses already, but I'd like to focus on one of the strengths now. Sir Patrick Lundie. Wow. I loved Sir Patrick. I really did. He is the uncle to Blanche, a lawyer, an older man who has a big heart. He was such a stand-out character. He was so kind, so wise, so witty, so funny, so intelligent. He was a good man. The complete opposite of our villain, Geoffrey Delamayn. (Geoffrey made Heathcliff look like good boyfriend material.) I found myself smiling every time Sir Patrick collided (in dialogue) with Lady Lundie, his sister-in-law.

This was my first introduction to Wilkie Collins, and I found this one to be interesting. True, it has flaws. It's a bit long, and it's prone to rambling at times. It's definitely didactic in nature. But at the same time it's complex in a good way. We meet a lot of interesting characters--good and bad--that are well-developed. (We may not love all of the characters. We may want to yell at some and slap a few others.) But the suspenseful pace of the last two hundred pages or so of the novel help to make up for some of the heaviness of the earlier sections. Is it for everyone? Probably not. But I'm very glad I read it.

Tour Dates for Wilkie Collins.
The Classics Circuit

© Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Thursday, December 03, 2009

Walking Backward (MG)


Austen, Catherine. 2009. Walking Backward. Orca Book Publishers. 167 pages.

My father is insane.

Josh and his younger brother Sam are struggling to cope with the death of their mother who died in a car accident. (Josh is twelve. Sam is four or five.) This "accident" was no accident. The reason his mom died is because someone put a snake in her car. When she saw the snake, she panicked, lost control, and crashed. (Whether they knew she had a phobia of snakes or not, this prank seems a bit out of control.) But will knowing the 'who' help Josh accept what has happened?

Each member of the family grieves differently. The father is emotionally checked out. He hides himself away from his two sons. Josh turns to exploring different religions and cultures--trying to learn about the process of grief. And scrapbooking. Josh wants to create a "Mom Book" to help him remember everything about her. Sam, well, he's got a different way of handling things. Ways involving an eight-inch Red Power Ranger doll. That and walking backwards.

The book is told through Josh's point of view. The book is his journal, a place where he is supposed to record all his strong emotions. I thought the family's pain--their sadness, their anger, their emptiness--was very raw and intense.

Review copy provided by publisher.

© Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

The Unwritten Rule (YA)


Scott, Elizabeth. 2010. The Unwritten Rule. Simon & Schuster. 210 pages. (April 2010, tentatively)

I liked him first, but it doesn't matter.
I still like him.
That doesn't matter either.
Or at least, it's not supposed to.


Sarah has liked Ryan for years. (Since he asked her to a dance back in eighth grade.) But when her friend, Brianna, makes a (successful) move on the new-and-improved Ryan at an end-of-summer party, Sarah feels guilty for wishing things were oh-so-different. Everything is complicated because Brianna is always insisting that Sarah come along when the she and Ryan hang out and when they "study" together. The three do get along together surprisingly well. But. Sarah can't help wishing that she was with Ryan.

Does she have reason to hope? How does Ryan see her? Does he see her like that? Would it matter if he did? Would she still choose to play by the rules if she knew that he cared for her too?

There are a million rules for being a girl. There are a million things you have to do to get through each day. High school has things that can trip you up, ruin you, people smile and say one thing and mean another, and you have to know all the rules, you have to know what you can and can't do. And one of them is this: You don't kiss your best friend's boyfriend. You don't do it once. You certainly don't do it twice. (116)
I enjoyed this one. The friendship between Sarah and Brianna is complicated. Good, bad, ugly, it's all there. And it's nice to see a book explore how some friendships can turn toxic somewhere along the way. But that's not to say Brianna can be summed up in a simple little word like toxic. She plays both victim and bully. Both Brianna and Sarah are human, flawed. And I love that. I love it when a book takes the time to develop characters and relationships. Scott's characters are always unique and quirky and have interesting (or sometimes not so interesting) lives. (Sarah's thing is for designing sneakers.)

I really love Elizabeth Scott. I really have loved all of her books: Love You Hate You Miss You, Something Maybe, Living Dead Girl, Stealing Heaven, Perfect You, and Bloom. Each has its place. And I'd definitely recommend all of them.

The quotes are from the ARC, so they are subject to change before the book is published in the spring of 2010. (The ARC was provided by the publisher.)

© Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

The Year of the Bomb (MG)


Kidd, Ronald. 2009. The Year of the Bomb. Simon & Schuster. 202 pages.

There were Martians in the backyard.

This is why I love the Cybils. I love discovering books like this one. The cover on this one didn't thrill me. It didn't say read me, read me. But. This book was oh-so-good. And I hope that you will give it a chance. You may just be surprised at how much you enjoy it.

What is it about? It's about a group of friends (boys) growing up in the fifties. (The year--to be exact--is 1955). (The boys are Arnie, Paul, Crank, and Oz.) What these boys have in common is science fiction and horror. Books. Movies. Magazines. Doesn't matter. If there are monsters or aliens lurking, they're there. They're hooked. Though they may be scared silly, they are loving every minute of it.

One day they learn that a movie--a horror movie--is going to be filmed in their hometown. (They live in Sierra Madre, California.) The film is Invasion of the Body Snatchers. From the minute they hear the news, they are excited, thrilled. Maybe just maybe they can watch the movie being filmed. Maybe they can see a few stars. This is what they've been waiting for. Finally. Something to be excited about.

This book is about the filming of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. But it is also about McCarthyism and the Cold War. Coming-of-age during this time in history. When the threat of war, of bombs, was very real.

I'd definitely recommend this one. If you like historical fiction. If you like coming of age stories. If you like science. If you like science fiction and/or horror. If you're a movie-lover. This one just felt so right to me. I love how everything comes together in this one. How the author, Ronald Kidd, weaved real facts into this fiction novel. There is a great author's note explaining what is real and what is not.

(This review copy was provided by the publisher.)

© Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Mysterious Benedict Society And The Prisoner's Dilemma (MG)


Stewart, Trenton Lee. 2009. The Mysterious Benedict Society and the Prisoner's Dilemma. Little, Brown Young Readers. 391 pages.

In a city called Stonetown, on the third floor of an old, gray-stoned house, a boy named Reynie Muldoon was considering his options.

This is the third book in the series. (The Mysterious Benedict Society; Mysterious Benedict Society and the Perilous Journey) It follows the continuing adventures of four super-smart kids: Reynie, Sticky, Kate, and Constance. These four kids live (along with their guardians and protectors) with Mr. Benedict. They are trying to keep the Whisperer out of the hands of the evil (boo, hiss) Mr. Curtain, the twin brother of Mr. Benedict. But trying to keep the world safe isn't all that easy. Danger is always lurking.

The kids are as clever as ever. Solving puzzles and riddles, thinking their way out of impossible-seeming situations. Working together as a team. Using each other's strengths and balancing out each other's weaknesses. It's got plenty of action and adventure.

Personally, I found this one to be a bit boring. I don't know why the action just didn't thrill me this time round. I loved the first one very much. Liked the second. But found this third to be just okay. For me. Remember this is all subjective. And you may love this one! I would still recommend it to fans of the series. It does provide resolution. And it is fun to revisit these characters again.

(Review copy provided by publisher.)

© Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews