Friday, April 11, 2008

Ramona Illustrators

The first two Ramona novels, Beezus and Ramona and Ramona the Pest were illustrated by Louis Darling. The other Ramona novels, Ramona the Brave, Ramona and Her Father, Ramona and Her Mother, Ramona Quimby, Age 8, Ramona Forever, and Ramona's World, were illustrated by Alan Tiegreen. These are the preferred illustrations. Those are the original illustrators. The new books feature the illustrations of Tracy Dockray throughout the entire series.

Louis Darling:



Alan Tiegreen:




Tracy Dockray




Who is your favorite Ramona illustrator?

10 comments:

Nicola 4:22 PM  

I've not seen those new ones before. Yuck! They are so modern looking, which not a good thing.

I've been known to say this before on my blog, but I hate (lot's of emotion here) when the original illustrations are replaced in classic children's literature. The pictures are just as important as the text, imo. They might as well mess around with the text too.

So, yeah, I like the original illustrations the best and especially Louis Darling's.

Jeane 10:28 AM  

I like Lois Darling's the best. Probably because they were the first ones I saw!

Tommy 7:35 AM  

Alan Tiegreen you rock best illustrations yet

Rabbit,  1:17 PM  

What Nicola said, I second that. The newer ones are absolutely inappropriate. They take a way from all of the old world charm of the books. They'd be better in some modern series, but they need to stay the hell out of Beverly'd books.

Sabrina 8:05 PM  

I grew up on Alan Tiegreen's illustrations so he's definitely my favorite!

Tracy 4:48 PM  

I liked Lois Darlings illustrations too but Harpers wanted to update the series to attract younger readers, which we aren't.

I think getting a book series new readers is the key aim here. Not pleasing grown ups.

As for Alan Tiergreen, I always thought his nose on Ramona looked like the tail that sticks up on the back end of a baked chicken.

Danielle,  10:38 AM  

I am so glad I found this blog just so I could comment on this topic! I am actually younger (17) but I grew up with the Alan Tiegreen illustrations which I think match Ramona's personallity perfectly. I agree with other comments that the new illustrations are terrible, modern, and have no business being in the Beverly Cleary books! They are modern and give the impression that Ramona is a little snob. Maybe that's what the publishers want her to look like. I also heard that Beverly Cleary did not like the way that Ramona or Beezus were portrayed in the new movie. It's sad when they have to change things. Well, I guess that's all, but I like the two older illustrations the best!!!

Cassi,  1:05 PM  

I'm 35 and I read Ramona the Pest with Louis Darling's illustrations. So it has nostalgic charm for me- I love them. But I also love Tracy Dockery's new illustrations! and so does my 9 yr. old son, who has read all the Ramona and Henry Huggins books multiple times. When I was a kid I read Ramona with Alan Tiegreen's illustration and I couldn't stand them then or now (I just re-read the whole series). Why do Ramona and Beezus have to be so ugly to be down to earth? Tracy Dockery really captured the sweetness of Beverly Cleary's characters, just like Louis Darling did. Dockery gets my vote!

Aritul 3:06 PM  

The other illustrators are good, but I'm going to have to go with Darling's if only for nostalgic reasons.

Paul Leo,  10:25 AM  

I only just found out about this "crime", the replacing of the Louis Darling illustrations with some "updated" ones. (The latter books, the ones published post-Darling, who died in 1970, I give a pass to.) I was APPALLED. That original Ramona, scowling, untidy, with a jump-off-the-page directness were WONDERFUL. And as it being necessary to have the pictures modernized to appeal to today's kids - balderdash! Even reading them as a boy in the early 70s I recognized the pics as already properly belonging to a different era - but IT DIDN'T MATTER. Those original illustrations were perfect, as was the Darling/Cleary marriage. The illustrations of the subsequent editions are innocuous, bland, anodyne, and tepid. There, have I made my sentiments quite clear? :)

Post a Comment

I'm always happy to hear from you! To help fight spam, comment moderation has been set up for posts older than two days. Feel free to ask me questions or ask for recommendations!

Review Policy

I am interested in reviewing books and audio books. This blog focuses on books written for middle grade on up (essentially 10 to a 110). I review middle grade fiction and young adult fiction (aka tween and teen).

I also review adult books.

I read in a variety of genres including realistic fiction, historical fiction, mystery, romance, science fiction, fantasy, literary fiction, and chick lit. (I've read one western to date.)

I read a few poetry books, a few short story collections, a few graphic novels, a few nonfiction books.

I am especially fond of:

  • Regency romances (including Austen prequels/sequels)
  • Historical fiction set in the Tudor dynasty
  • Historical fiction and nonfiction set during World War II
  • Jewish fiction/nonfiction
  • dystopias
  • apocalyptic fiction
  • science fiction (especially if it involves time travel and alternate realities)
  • fantasy
  • multicultural books and international books

I am not a fan of:

  • sports books
  • horse books
  • dog books if the dog dies (same goes with most pets actually except maybe fish)
  • westerns (if it's a pioneer story with women and children, then maybe)
  • extremely violent books with blood, blood, and more blood

I am more interested in strong characters, well-written, fleshed-out, human characters. Plot is secondary to me in a way. I have to care about the characters in order to care about the plot. That being said, compelling storytelling is something that I love. I love to become absorbed in what I'm reading.

If you're interested in sending me a review copy of your book, I'm happy to hear from you. Email me at laney_po AT yahoo DOT com.

You should know several things before you contact me:

1) I do not guarantee a review of your book. I am just agreeing to consider it for review.
2) I give all books at least fifty pages.
3) I am not promising anyone (author or publisher) a positive review in exchange for a review copy. That's not how I work.
4) In all of my reviews I strive for honesty. My reviews are my opinions--so yes, they are subjective--you should know my blog will feature both negative and positive reviews.
5) I do not guarantee that I will get to your book immediately. I've got so many books I'm trying to read and review, I can't promise to get to any one book in a given time frame.
6) Emailing me every other week to see if I've read your book won't help me get to it any faster. Though if you want to email me to check and see if it arrived safely, then that's fine!

Authors, publishers. I am interested in interviewing authors and participating in blog tours. (All I ask is that I receive a review copy of the author's latest book beforehand so the interview will be productive. If the book is part of a series, I'd like to review the whole series.) Contact me if you're interested.

Unique Visitors and Google PR Rank

Free PageRank Checker

Pageloads Counter

Search Book Blogs Search Engine

Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

  © Blogger template Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP