Sunday, July 01, 2012

The Sunday Salon: Watching Jane Eyre (1997)

Today I'm sharing my thoughts on the 1997 adaptation of Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre. This film stars Samantha Morton and Ciaran Hinds.

Was it faithful to Charlotte Bronte's novel? No and Yes. OR, if you prefer, yes and no. Did every character from the book make it into the film? NO. Did every scene from the book make it into the film? NO. Did every important character and every important scene make it into the film? Well? I don't know how to answer that.

For example, in this adaptation, Jane does NOT learn that the Rivers are her cousins, and she does NOT inherit the money from her dead uncle. Rosamond Oliver and Mary Rivers have both disappeared from this adaptation. But how important are the Rivers to the story as a whole? Do people love Jane Eyre because she runs away and spends time with cousins she didn't even know she had? Or is the romance itself most important to readers and viewers?

Another example, in this adaptation, Jane does leave Thornfield Hall to visit her dying aunt, but, if you blink you'll miss it. Because within seconds of her leaving she's returned. We're told she spent a month there, but, we don't see a minute of it. You have to ask yourself if you love Jane Eyre because of those scenes, that time spent with her dying aunt, and her Reed cousins, or do you love Jane Eyre because of the main story with Mr. Rochester and his mad wife. 

Was it faithful to the book where it counted the most? Was it faithful in the character of Jane Eyre? Was it faithful in the character of Mr. Rochester? Did it do justice to their romance? Were the scenes between Jane and Edward done properly? Did the actors interpret the characters in a way that was true to the book? Did anything feel off? 

I happened to enjoy Samantha Morton as Jane Eyre. I really, really liked her in this role. I thought she did a great job being Jane. I loved her narration, for example. I thought she did a good job with getting the character right. She is definitely a good reason to watch this adaptation.

As for Ciaran Hinds, well, it's hard for me to say. For one thing, a couple of his scenes made me want to cringe. Truly. I did not like the way he portrayed Mr. Rochester. There were a couple of scenes I thought he was TOO angry, TOO violent, TOO forceful, TOO scary, TOO intimidating, TOO dramatic. Particularly the oh-so-crucial after-the-non-wedding, post-big-reveal scene. His temper tantrum is just so out of character. He's way too physical, too physically abusive--bordering on it anyway. And the whole scene just makes me cringe. That is NOT the way it's supposed to go, that is NOT how it was handled in the book.

And at times I felt Hinds' Mr. Rochester was not dimensional enough, sure, he got a few of the emotions down, but, did he capture the full complexity of Bronte's hero?! I'm not sure he did. Also, on a more personal note, the mustache and sideburns bothered me. From certain angles, I kept seeing Tennessee Ernie Ford. (When I wasn't thinking of this animated villain.)

Was this adaptation faithful when it comes to portraying the relationship between Jane and Edward? I think it was. I think the dialogue between them worked. I think many of their scenes were faithful to the book--for the most part. 

I thought this was a very comfortable Jane Eyre to watch. It was just around two hours. You could sit and watch it comfortably all at once. Yes, it condensed things, yes, certain things were missing from this adaptation. But it made sense, it flowed smoothly. I found many, many things delightful about it. I enjoyed many of the scenes, of course, I had issues with a couple of scenes. I didn't particularly love the first meeting between Jane Eyre and Mr. Rochester, I thought it was way too dramatic, definitely over-the-top. But other scenes made up for it, in my opinion.

I did think the film did a good job creating ambiance--at capturing the gothic elements of this one. There were scenes that captured the mystery, suspense, and horror of the original.

I thought Abigail Cruttenden brought something unique to Blanche Ingram--for better or worse. In this film, she was portrayed sympathetically, or more sympathetically than in other adaptations. While we're still told that she was mainly after Mr. Rochester's money, she's not portrayed one-dimensionally as vain and haughty. While she may not be exactly friendly towards "the governess." She doesn't come across as mean and deserving of what she gets. (That is Mr. Rochester using and manipulating her, leading her to believe one thing, but in all truth just trying to make Jane jealous.) Is that a good thing? Well, I suppose that depends on your perspective. Would a nice Caroline Bingley work in Pride and Prejudice? Are people so determined to not like Blanche Ingram that this slightly modified Blanche would offend? I'm not sure.

 St. John Rivers is likewise portrayed sympathetically. He doesn't come across as offensively as he does in other adaptations. He actually seems quite nice, quite pleasant, as someone who actually has people-skills.

Have you seen this adaptation? What did you think of it?

Watch Jane Eyre
  • If you're a fan of the book
  • If you're a fan of Victorian period dramas 
Other Jane Eyre (movie) reviews



© 2012 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

7 comments:

Juli Rahel 9:54 AM  

I do think it is crucial to see how Jane interacts with her cousins and especially with her aunt when she returns to her. It shows the strength of her character and lifts her above the stereotype of girl falls in love with rich older man.

I do think a nice Ingram Blanche would work because I think the novel also comments on the role of women in society. And whereas Jane seems a victor because she decides her own destiny, Blanche is very much a victim, I think, and therefore the audience could be sympathetic with her!

Thanks for sharing, I am loving your weekly Jane Eyre reviews XD
Juli @ Universe in Words

Becky 10:06 AM  

Juli, I tend to agree with you. Jane's transformation is best seen perhaps through her visits to her dying aunt and to her Rivers cousins. It shows her compassion, resilience, determination, independence, strength. In particular, if she was not confident and sure of who she was, she could have been bullied or dominated by St. John Rivers. He doesn't "get" who she is, who she really is, but she knows herself, she knows that it is important to be true to yourself. And Jane is a woman who knows that she deserves to be treated well, that she is worthy of love, that she doesn't have to settle for St. John because "she was not made for love, but for labor." She is a wiser woman now.

Juli Rahel 10:31 AM  

I couldn't agree more! And because she becomes wiser, her relationship with Rochester becomes more equal and true, I think.

Megan Wille 1:58 PM  

I started to read Jane Eyre but had trouble with it. Got stuck along the way. My favorite still remains Pride and Prejudice. Mr. Darcy has to be one of my favorite characters. Love the novel and the movies :)

M.J. Wille, author

Tasha B. 2:02 AM  

I'm a fan of Ciaran Hinds, but I totally agree with you about his portrayal of Mr. Rochester. When this first aired my friend and I were making fun of his constant scene-chewing, especially in the post-wedding scene. "So typical, Jane!"

I do think Samantha Morton was one of the best Janes I've ever seen, though. She looks plain enough to be believable as Jane, but she doesn't act meek or boring like some actresses do in the role.

Beckie B. 5:08 PM  

I loved this movie version of the book too. You are right, Ciaran Hinds is a bit harsh in his portrayal. but I like him, so I will overlook it this time. ;)

Becky 9:53 AM  

Juli, I agree! I think the romance is better *when* they come back together as equals. Some movie versions get this right, others don't quite catch Jane's transformation.

Megan, I like P&P too! Not as much as Jane Eyre perhaps. But I love Jane Austen!!!

Tasha, I agree. Love Samantha Morton in this role!!!

Beckie, I like him in other roles better. I really wish I could say I loved him in this one though.

Post a Comment

I'm always happy to hear from you! To help fight spam, comment moderation has been set up for posts older than two days. Feel free to ask me questions or ask for recommendations!

Review Policy

I am interested in reviewing books and audio books. This blog focuses on books written for middle grade on up (essentially 10 to a 110). I review middle grade fiction and young adult fiction (aka tween and teen).

I also review adult books.

I read in a variety of genres including realistic fiction, historical fiction, mystery, romance, science fiction, fantasy, literary fiction, and chick lit. (I've read one western to date.)

I read a few poetry books, a few short story collections, a few graphic novels, a few nonfiction books.

I am especially fond of:

  • Regency romances (including Austen prequels/sequels)
  • Historical fiction set in the Tudor dynasty
  • Historical fiction and nonfiction set during World War II
  • Jewish fiction/nonfiction
  • dystopias
  • apocalyptic fiction
  • science fiction (especially if it involves time travel and alternate realities)
  • fantasy
  • multicultural books and international books

I am not a fan of:

  • sports books
  • horse books
  • dog books if the dog dies (same goes with most pets actually except maybe fish)
  • westerns (if it's a pioneer story with women and children, then maybe)
  • extremely violent books with blood, blood, and more blood

I am more interested in strong characters, well-written, fleshed-out, human characters. Plot is secondary to me in a way. I have to care about the characters in order to care about the plot. That being said, compelling storytelling is something that I love. I love to become absorbed in what I'm reading.

If you're interested in sending me a review copy of your book, I'm happy to hear from you. Email me at laney_po AT yahoo DOT com.

You should know several things before you contact me:

1) I do not guarantee a review of your book. I am just agreeing to consider it for review.
2) I give all books at least fifty pages.
3) I am not promising anyone (author or publisher) a positive review in exchange for a review copy. That's not how I work.
4) In all of my reviews I strive for honesty. My reviews are my opinions--so yes, they are subjective--you should know my blog will feature both negative and positive reviews.
5) I do not guarantee that I will get to your book immediately. I've got so many books I'm trying to read and review, I can't promise to get to any one book in a given time frame.
6) Emailing me every other week to see if I've read your book won't help me get to it any faster. Though if you want to email me to check and see if it arrived safely, then that's fine!

Authors, publishers. I am interested in interviewing authors and participating in blog tours. (All I ask is that I receive a review copy of the author's latest book beforehand so the interview will be productive. If the book is part of a series, I'd like to review the whole series.) Contact me if you're interested.

Unique Visitors and Google PR Rank

Free PageRank Checker

Pageloads Counter

Search Book Blogs Search Engine

The background is based on a background I found here...with some small adjustments on my part so it would work with the template.
Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

  © Blogger template Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP